检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田彬彬[1,2] 张欢 林超 李文健 TIAN Binbin;ZHANG Huan;LIN Chao;LI Wenjian(School of Public Finance and Taxation,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law;Research Center for Tax Governance,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law;School of Finance,Renmin University of China;School of Economics,Zhejiang University)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学财政税务学院,430073 [2]中南财经政法大学税收治理研究中心,430073 [3]中国人民大学财政金融学院,100872 [4]浙江大学经济学院,310058
出 处:《经济研究》2024年第8期57-76,共20页Economic Research Journal
基 金:国家自然科学基金(72473157,71973153);高等学校学科创新引智计划(B20084);中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费的资助。
摘 要:税收优惠是否落地直接关系到减税政策的有效性,是税制体系设计需要考虑的重要问题。已有研究着重从企业层面讨论了影响优惠落地的因素,忽视了税务部门行为激励的潜在影响。本文的研究基于政治经济学视角,从税收任务这一我国税务部门的核心激励机制入手,讨论其对税收优惠落地的影响。在理论分析的基础上,本文基于2008—2015年间全国层面的宏微观数据,以小微企业所得税税收优惠作为主要的优惠政策背景,从实证层面考察了税收任务对于税收优惠落地的影响。研究结果显示:一方面,任务压力的存在显著抑制了税收优惠落地;另一方面,征管裁量权是构成上述关系的重要制度基础,裁量权的压缩显著弱化了任务对于优惠落地的抑制作用。本文的研究对于理解我国减税政策的效应,以及征管体制的长期改革提供了有益启示。In addition to the general standardized tax system,the formulation of tax benefits for specific fields and industries is the primary means of conducting macroeconomic stimulus and industrial regulation by the government.In addition to the policy formulation itself,the extent to which tax benefits are taken-up is one of the keys to determining the effectiveness of tax benefits.However,in many developing countries,including China,the extent to which tax benefits are taken-up is generally low.Existing studies suggest that institutional transaction costs,information friction,and behavioral economics factors such as tax compliance are the three key factors influencing the take-up of tax benefits,but they overlook the potential impact of the behavioral incentives of the tax authority.In fact,there are stringent prior checking and approval processes in tax benefits,and the tax authority has broad discretion over many aspects of tax benefits.Obviously,if we overlook the role of the tax authority,the understanding of the take-up of tax benefits will hardly be complete.In order to promote collection efficiency,especially ensure timely and full collection of tax revenue,China's tax authority has implemented a performance evaluation system based on the completion of revenue targets for a long period.Under such a logic of action,any policy objective that conflicts with the completion of revenue targets will be disturbed.Taking tax benefits as an example,the implementation of tax benefits is formally at the expense of reducing the total tax revenue in the current period,and therefore,when the implementation of tax benefits does not constitute the main performance evaluation indicators,and the tax authority has broad discretion for tax benefits,strengthening the approval procedure and even hindering the reasonable take-up of tax benefits to a certain extent,so as to ensure the timely realization of the revenue target,will become the preferred strategy of the tax authority.Based on macro and micro data of China from 2008 to 2015
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90