“信息换给付”下捆绑禁令的内在体系与规范构造——对《个人信息保护法》第16条的解读  

The Internal System and Normative Structure of the Coupling Prohibition under“Information in Exchange for Payment”——Interpretation of Article 16 of the Personal Information Protection Law

作　　者：付举乾 Fu Juqian

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院

出　　处：《交大法学》2024年第6期126-141,共16页SJTU Law Review

基　　金：国家留学基金委“国外合作项目(创新型人才国际合作培养项目)”(项目编号:202306190044)资助。

摘　　要：“信息换给付”以合同自由为价值基础,在现代数字经济中是一种常见的交易模式。捆绑禁令的目的是,通过限制“信息换给付”实现信息自决。在此背景下,捆绑禁令是在合同自由与信息自决的冲突与协作中形成的法律制度。与此内在体系相应,《个人信息保护法》第16条规定的捆绑禁令具有相对性。信息处理者的捆绑行为在既不附替代性对价、亦非信息处理者履行合同义务所必需时,才会违反该条禁令。另外,对违法捆绑行为的法律制裁应为,信息主体做出的同意无效。信息主体通过“信息换给付”合同取得的债权不会因此受到影响。"Information exchange for payment"is based on freedom of contract,which is a common transaction mode in the modern digital economy.The purpose of the coupling prohibition is to achieve information autonomy by restricting"information exchange for payment".In this context,the prohibition of coupling is a legal institution formed in the conflict and collaboration between freedom of contract and information autonomy.Corresponding to this internal system,the prohibition of coupling stipulated in Article 16 of the Personal Informat ion Protection Law is relative.The coupling behavior of the information processor will only violate the prohibition when it is neither accompanied by an alternative consideration nor necessary for the information processor to perform its contractual obligations.In addition,the legal sanction for illegal coupling should be that the consent given by the information subject is invalid.The creditor's rights obtained by the information subject through the"information exchange for payment"contract will not be affected by this violation.

关 键 词：信息换给付 捆绑禁令 信息自决 信息处理 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]