检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Liu Yanfeng 刘艳峰
机构地区:[1]Nanjing University [2]Jiangsu Provincial Party School
出 处:《Contemporary International Relations》2024年第5期66-85,共20页现代国际关系(英文版)
基 金:a phased result of a project supported by the National Social Science Fund of China in 2020 entitled “The Reconstruction of ‘ASEAN Centrality’ in the Context of ‘Indo–Pacific’ Strategy”(Grant Number:20CGJ029)。
摘 要:ASEAN countries are important targets for the United States to promote the “Indo–Pacific” minilateral framework. Their official, think tank, and media opinions regard this as an important opportunity to enhance their national status and promote their national interests, which will be beneficial to peace and stability in the “Indo–Pacific” region. However, they are worried that it will damage the “ASEAN centrality.” ASEAN has responded positively and is committed to reshaping its “central position” and regional leadership and improving regional governance capabilities, but there are differences in the responses of various countries. In the future, ASEAN countries will seek to achieve direct and practical interests through the US “Indo–Pacific” minilateral framework, but they are more wor ried that the “central position of ASEAN” will be replaced and its “neutral and balanced” position will be threatened.
关 键 词:ASEAN centrality ASEAN countries “Indo–Pacific” minilateral framework
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.45.231