论生成式人工智能创作物的著作权法保护  

On the Protectionof Copyright Law for Generative Artificial Intelligence Creations

作　　者：王霁霞[1] 高旭 WANG Jixia;GAO Xu(School of Humanities and Law,University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China)

机构地区：[1]北京科技大学文法学院,北京100083

出　　处：《湖南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第5期103-110,共8页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：以ChatGPT为代表的生成式人工智能出现后,人工智能创作不断涌现,带来了诸如人工智能能否成为作者、人工智能生成物能否成为作品、是否需要对人工智能生成物进行保护、人工智能生成物的收益应当归属谁等一系列法律难题。从各国的实践和理论探讨来看,解决人工智能生成物的著作权法保护主要有三种方案。然而,基于著作权法的立法目的、避免法律体系陷入根本性动荡和维护人的主体性原则等原因,应当否认人工智能的作者身份,同时对生成式人工智能创作物给予分级分类保护,即自动生成物进入公共领域,人类投入了独创性贡献的辅助生成物给予著作权保护,利益归投入了独创性贡献的主体。因为只有坚持人的主体性,将著作权法的激励重点回归到对人的激励方面,才能在迅猛发展的生成式人工智能时代为人类的思想和创造保留生长的土壤。With the emergence of generative artificial intelligence represented by ChatGPT,generative AI has shown an emerging state,greatly weakening the role of humans in it and bringing forth a series of legal challenges:Is AI the author?Is AI product a work of art?Do we need to protect it?Who should the benefits of AI generated products belong to?From the practice and theoretical exploration of various countries,there are three existing solutions.Based on the legislative purposes of copyright law,avoiding fundamental turbulence in the legal system,and upholding the principle of human subjectivity,the authorship of AI should be denied,and meanwhile,generative AI creations should be given graded and classified protection:automatically generated contents entering the public domain,auxiliary generated products that humans have invested in original contributions should be given copyright protection,and benefits should belong to the main body of original contributions.Only by adhering to human subjectivity and returning the focus of copyright law incentives to human motivation can we preserve the soil for the growth of human thought and creativity in the rapidly developing era of generative AI.

关 键 词：人工智能 生成式人工智能 著作权 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]