检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钱志超 胡必玲 刘敏敏 QIAN Zhichao;HU Biling;LIU Minmin(College of Intelligence and Computing,Hefei Normal University,Hefei,Anhui 230000,China)
机构地区:[1]合肥师范学院计算机与人工智能学院,安徽合肥230000
出 处:《控制与信息技术》2024年第5期72-78,共7页CONTROL AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
基 金:安徽省质量工程教学研究项目(2021jyxm1242);安徽省大学生创新创业训练项目(14098124);校级质量工程线上线下混合式课程(2022xsxx08)。
摘 要:针对传统算法无法很好地解决无线传感器网络(wireless sensor network,WSN)三维非均匀覆盖的问题,文章提出一种基于改进流向算法(improved flow direction algorithm,IFDA)的无线传感器网络三维覆盖优化算法。其首先引入Gauss映射对节点初始化分布进行处理,使节点分布更为均匀,提高了传感器网络对事件的覆盖率;其次,将T分布扰动融入流向算法,使得算法的全局搜索能力进一步提高;最后提出了一种基于随机数的越界处理方法,以优化节点的越界重定位。将所提出的优化算法与虚拟力算法(virtual force algorithm,VFA)、未知目标精确覆盖算法(exact cover algorithm,ECA)和人工势场算法(artifical potential field algorithm,APFA)在事件呈T型不均匀部署和线型不均匀部署两种情况下进行对比实验,结果表明,在事件呈T型不均匀分布下,IFDA算法的覆盖效能较VFA算法、ECA算法、APFA算法的分别有3.0%、4.2%和6.3%的提高;在事件呈线型不均匀分布下,IFDA算法的覆盖效能较其他3种算法的分别有5.1%、6.2%和7.1%的提升,能够较好地解决无线传感器网络在三维非均匀覆盖情况下节点的分布问题。Traditional algorithms often struggle to address the issue of three-dimensional non-uniform coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks(WSNs).This paper presents a three-dimensional coverage optimization algorithm for WSNs,based on an improved flow direction algorithm.Firstly,Gauss mapping is introduced to process the initialized distribution of nodes,allowing for a more uniform distribution and enhancing the coverage of events within the sensor network.Secondly,T-distribution perturbation is integrated into the flow direction algorithm,further improving its global search capability.Finally,a random-number-based processing method is incorporated to optimize the relocation of out-of-bounds nodes.The proposed optimization algorithm was compared experimentally with Virtual Force Algorithm(VFA),Exact Coverage Algorithm for Unknown Targets(ECA),and Artificial Potential Field Algorithm(APFA)under two scenarios:T-type non-uniform distribution and linear non-uniform distribution of events.The results showed that,under the former scenario,the coverage efficiency of the Improved Flow Direction Algorithm(IFDA)was improved by 3.0%,4.2%,and 6.3%compared to VFA,ECA,and APFA,respectively.Under the latter scenario,the coverage efficiency of IFDA was improved by 5.1%,6.2%,and 7.1%compared to the other three algorithms,respectively.These findings demonstrate the better performance of the proposed algorithm in addressing the node distribution issue in WSNs in the case of three-dimensional non-uniform coverage.
分 类 号:TP393[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33