中国都市圈的产业分工与功能协同分析  

Industrial divisions and the functional synergy of Chinese metropolitan areas

作　　者：石敏俊 孙艺文 SHI Minjun;SUN Yiwen(School of Public Affairs,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学公共管理学院,杭州310058

出　　处：《地理学报》2024年第10期2495-2510,共16页Acta Geographica Sinica

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(21ZDA071)。

摘　　要：都市圈正在成为支撑国家经济增长、促进区域协调发展和参与全球竞争合作的重要空间载体。国际上一般认为都市圈是1 h通勤圈,当前中国都市圈规划同时提出城市间产业分工协作的目标,希冀建成空间结构清晰、城市功能互补、产业分工协调的现代化都市圈。本文基于城市间投入产出分析,对中国都市圈内部的产业分工与功能协同展开研究。结果表明:①基于产业分工与功能协同,可以将中国都市圈分为单中心离散结构、核心—边缘结构、边缘拓展结构和多中心网络结构4种类型,多中心网络结构是都市圈空间结构演化的高级阶段;②中国都市圈的产业链空间网络多数由加工制造品生产环节网络流主导,首都、天津都市圈加工制造品生产环节网络流与同类型都市圈相比存在较大差距,成都、长株潭和广州都市圈生产性服务环节网络流存在明显提升空间;③若要将中国都市圈建设成为功能互补的产业协作圈,关键在于优化产业链空间网络,强化城市间功能协同,促进都市圈内部的空间融合;④长株潭、石家庄、成都和武汉等单中心离散结构都市圈应先向核心—边缘结构都市圈演化,南京、杭州等边缘拓展结构都市圈以及天津、深圳、广州和首都等核心—边缘结构都市圈应向多中心网络结构演化。Metropolitan areas are pivotal in driving national economic growth,advancing harmonious regional development,and participating in competitive international collaboration.Consistent with international consensus,China's planning policies define metropolitan areas as a one-hour commuting circle.Simultaneously,these planning protocols particularly highlight the importance of industrial specialization and intercity collaboration,with the objective of developing modern urban agglomerations characterized by a well-defined spatial structure,complementary urban functions,and an integrated industrial division.This study uses the 2017 intercity input-output table analysis to examine patterns of industrial division and functional synergy in Chinese metropolitan areas.The findings are as follows:(1)From the perspective of industrial division and functional synergy,Chinese metropolitan areas can be categorized into four distinct spatial structures:the single-center dispersed structure,the core-periphery structure,the peripheral expansion structure,and the multi-center network structure representing an advanced phase in the spatial evolution of metropolitan areas.(2)The spatial network of industrial chains in Chinese metropolitan areas is predominantly governed by the flow of processing and manufacturing links.There is a substantial gap in the processing and manufacturing links between the Beijing and Tianjin metropolitan areas compared to similar types of metropolitan areas,and there is considerable potential for enhancing the productive service links in the Guangzhou,Chengdu,and Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan metropolitan areas.(3)The essence of transforming Chinese metropolitan areas into functionally complementary industrial cooperation areas is to further refine the spatial network of the industrial chains,strengthen functional synergy between cities,and encourage spatial integration in the metropolitan areas.(4)Single-center dispersed structure metropolitan areas,including Shijiazhuang,Chengdu,Wuhan,and Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangt

关 键 词：都市圈 空间融合 产业分工与功能协同 产业链空间网络 城市间投入产出表 

分 类 号：F299.2[经济管理—国民经济]