检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙永祥 王丽娟 戴晗 Sun Yongxiang;Wang Lijuan;Dai Han(Law School of Southwest Medical University,Luzhou,Sichuan 646000,China)
出 处:《卫生法学》2024年第6期32-37,66,共7页Health Law
摘 要:丧失生存机会与死亡一同被列为医疗损害后果。丧失生存机会舶来自机会丧失理论,其在请求权基础、因果关系论证以及法律责任方面皆与死亡这类传统侵权理论有所不同。当患者罹患既定疾病且最终死亡时,该患者发病死亡之过程是否为既定疾病的自然转归是区别死亡与丧失生存机会的关键。但医疗损害司法实践中,二后果间界限的模糊引发损害救济的不平衡。因此,应将两者所涵摄之法律要件进行梳理及对比分析。The loss of survival opportunities and death are both listed as medical damage consequences.The loss of survival opportunities comes from the theory of loss of opportunity,which differs from traditional tort theories such as death in terms of claim basis,causal relationship argument,and legal liability.When a patient suffers from a predetermined disease and ultimately dies,whether the process of the patient's onset and death is a natural outcome of the predetermined disease is the key to distinguishing between death and loss of survival opportunities.However,in the judicial practice of medical injury,the blurring of the boundary between the two consequences leads to an imbalance in damage relief.Therefore,this article will sort out and compare the legal elements contained in the loss of survival opportunities and death.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.113.183