产品责任损害赔偿范围问题研究——《侵权责任编司法解释(一)》第19条的理解与适用  

Product Liability Damages Including Compensation for Product Self-Damage:Understanding and Application of Article 19 of the Judicial Interpretation(Ⅰ)of the Tort Liability Section of the Civil Code

作　　者：杨立新[1,2] Yang Lixin

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院 [2]教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心

出　　处：《中国应用法学》2024年第5期1-14,共14页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence

基　　金：北京市社会科学研究基金重点研究项目“民法典实施中的疑难问题研究”(编号:21FXA004)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：《侵权责任编司法解释(一)》第19条对《民法典》第1202条和第1203条规定的“损害”,解释为损害赔偿范围包括“缺陷产品本身的损害以及其他财产损害”即“缺陷产品自损+其他财产损害”的产品责任损害赔偿模式,在理论上平息了对此问题的争论,在实务上统一了裁判规则。对此进行理论说明,“硬着陆”的做法过于生硬,有违法理;采取“软着陆”的方法,即采用诉的合并理论,将产品责任的固有利益损害与产品自损的预期利益损害两种赔偿实现诉讼的合并,由同一法院管辖和裁判,既不违反《民法典》的规定,又符合产品责任的法理,还能实现及时、便捷地保护用户、消费者的合法权益的立法目的。Article 19 of the“Judicial Interpretation of Tort Liability(Ⅰ)”interprets the damages stipulated in Articles 1202 and 1203 of the Civil Code as“the scope of damages includes damages to the defective product itself as well as damages to property other than the defective product”.This has calmed the debate on this issue in theory and standardized the rules of adjudication in practice.This theory explains,“hard landing”approach is too rigid,there are violations of the law.The method of“soft landing”,that is,using the theory of merger,the damage to the inherent interests of product liability and the damage to the expected interests of product self-damage to realize the lawsuit merger,by the same court jurisdiction and referee,not only does not violate the provisions of the Civil Code,but also is in line with the jurisprudence of the product liability,which can achieve the purpose of the legislation conducive to the protection of the lawful rights and interests of users and consumers in a timely and convenient manner.

关 键 词：侵权责任编司法解释 产品责任损害赔偿 产品自损 诉的合并 软着陆 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]