论诉的客观合并的程序路径——以信息网络传播权与不正当竞争之诉的合并为对象  

Procedural Path of Objective Combination of Litigation: A Study on the Combination of theRight to Network Dissemination of Information and Unfair Compet ition Litigation

作　　者：纪格非[1] Ji Gefei

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学

出　　处：《中国应用法学》2024年第5期112-122,共11页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“以人民为中心的民事司法程序前沿问题研究”(编号:20AZD118)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：信息网络传播权侵权与不正当竞争侵权合并起诉的案件比较常见,多数情况下原告并不明确诉的合并形态,法院通常按照单纯诉的合并处理,在分别审理两项请求后一一作出裁判。上述做法虽最大限度实现了原告的利益,但是却扩大了法院的审理和裁判范围,增加了被告的负担。单纯诉的合并并非诉的客观合并的唯一形态,不同类型的诉的客观合并针对不同的实体请求权的形态,遵从不同的诉讼法理,实现不同的程序功能。信息网络传播权侵权与不正当竞争侵权合并起诉的案件中,应发挥法院的释明作用,引导当事人选择适当的合并形态,并对不同类型的客观合并之诉适用不同的审理规则。It is common to see cases where the infringement of the right to network dissemination of information and the infringement of unfair competition are j ointly sued.In most cases,the plaintiffs do not specify the form of the combination of the suits,and the court usually handles the case in accordance with the simple combination of the suits,and renders decisions individually after hearing the two claims separately.Although the above practice maximizes the interests of the plaintiff,it expands the scope of the court's hearing and decision,increasing the burden of the defendant.Simple combination is not the only form of objective combination,different types of objective combination aim at different forms of substantive claims,comply with different litigation jurisprudence,and achieve different procedural functions.In the cases of the right to network dissemination of information infringement and unfair competition infringement,the court should play the role of interpretation to guide the parties to choose the appropriate form of the combination,and apply different trial rules to different types of objective combination of litigation.

关 键 词：诉的客观合并 预备合并 释明权 请求权竞合 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学] D922.294[政治法律—法学]