一种创新组件在乳腺麦默通碎组织病理包埋环节中的应用  

The Application of an Innovative Component in Pathological Embedding Process of Fragment Breast Tissue by Mammotome

作　　者：叶美华[1] 方庆全[1] 陈宏伟 YE Mei-hua;FANG Qing-quan;CHEN Hong-wei(Department of Pathology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University,Fujian Xiamen 361003)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学附属第一医院病理科,福建厦门361003

出　　处：《中国医疗器械信息》2024年第19期67-69,共3页China Medical Device Information

摘　　要：目的:探讨一种创新组件在乳腺麦默通碎组织病理包埋环节的应用价值。方法:收集2024年1月~2024年5月的60例乳腺麦默通碎组织标本,每例取2份碎组织,随机分为两组,均按病理常规程序脱水处理后进行包埋,包埋镊组:使用包埋镊进行常规包埋处理;创新组件组:用无齿镊调整部分碎组织位置使其不相互重叠,用预热的创新组件的金属块代替包埋镊轻压碎组织,以力争使碎组织均集中于包埋模具底部,盖上包埋盒,然后将带有碎组织的包埋模具置于创新组件的方形盘内进行冷却,余包埋方式同包埋镊组。比较不同包埋方式的包埋时间与包埋合格率,及比较不同包埋方式下蜡块的粗修厚度与碎组织损伤情况。结果:包埋镊组每例碎组织平均包埋时间为(25.68±4.16)s,显著长于创新组件组的(16.48±3.43)s(t=13.21,P<0.001);包埋镊组包埋合格率为88.33%(53/60),低于创新组件组的100.00%(60/60)(χ^(2)=5.46,P<0.05);包埋镊组每个碎组织蜡块平均粗修厚度为(529.00±50.01)μm,显著厚于创新组件组的(370.00±55.42)μm(t=16.50,P<0.001);包埋镊组组织损伤率为18.33%(11/60),显著高于创新组件组的0(0/60)(χ^(2)=12.11,P<0.01)。结论:采用创新组件优化乳腺麦默通碎组织病理包埋环节,包埋效率与包埋合格率高,切片时粗修少,碎组织损伤少,可提高工作效率与切片质量。Objective:To explore the application value of an innovative component in pathological embedding link of breast Mammotome fragmented tissue.Methods:60 specimens of fragmented breast tissues by Mammotome from January 2024 to May 2024 were collected.2 fragmented tissues were taken from each case and randomly divided into two groups.All of them were dehydrated according to the routine pathological procedures and then embedded.Embedding tweezers group:Conventional embedding treatment using embedding tweezers;Innovative component group:Used toothless tweezers to adjust the position of some broken tissues so as not to overlap each other,used preheated metal blocks of innovative components instead of embedding tweezers to lightly crush the tissues,so as to concentrate the fragmented tissues at the bottom of the embedding mold,covered the embedding box,and then placed the embedding mold with broken tissues in the square tray of innovative components for cooling,and the rest embedding methods were the same as those of the embedding tweezers group.The embedding time and qualified rate of different embedding methods were compared,and the rough repair thickness and broken tissue damage of wax blocks under different embedding methods were compared.Results:The average embedding time of each fragmented tissue in the embedding tweezers group was(25.68±4.16)s,which was significantly longer than that in the innovative component group(t=13.21,P<0.001);The qualification rate of embedding tweezers group was 88.33%(53/60),which was lower than that of innovative component group(100.00%,60/60)(χ^(2)=5.46,P<0.05);The average rough thickness of each wax block in the embedding tweezers group was(529.00±50.01)μm,which was significantly thicker than that in the innovative component group(370.00±55.42)μm(t=16.50,P<0.001);The tissue injury rate of the embedding tweezers group was 18.33%(11/60),which was significantly higher than that of the innovative component group[0(0/60)](χ^(2)=12.11,P<0.01).Conclusion:Using innovative components to

关 键 词：创新组件 乳腺 麦默通 碎组织 包埋 

分 类 号：R446.1[医药卫生—诊断学]