检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许文婷[1] 谌永毅[2] 谢玲女[3] 郑美春[4] 张洁 叶新梅[6] 高艳秋[7] XU Wen-ting;CHEN Yong-yi;XIE Ling-nv;ZHENG Mei-chun;ZHANG Jie;YE Xin-mei;GAO Yan-qiu(The Second Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University,Jiangsu Suzhou 215000;Hunan Cancer Hospital,Hunan Changsha 410000;Zhejiang Cancer Hospital,Zhejiang Hangzhou 310000;Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,Guangdong Guangzhou 510000;Shaanxi Cancer Hospital,Shaanxi Xi’an 710000;The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangdong Guangzhou 510000;Shandong Provincial Hospital,Shandong Jinan 250000)
机构地区:[1]苏州大学附属第二医院,江苏苏州215000 [2]湖南省肿瘤医院,湖南长沙410000 [3]浙江省肿瘤医院,浙江杭州310000 [4]中山大学肿瘤防治中心,广东广州510000 [5]陕西省肿瘤医院,陕西西安710000 [6]中山大学附属第六医院,广东广州510000 [7]山东省立医院,山东济南250000
出 处:《中国医疗器械信息》2024年第19期139-143,共5页China Medical Device Information
摘 要:目的:评价德舒妥两件式造口袋在结肠造口患者中的有效性、安全性,以及其是否非劣效于胜舒两件式造口袋。方法:随机、开放、平行、阳性对照、多中心、非劣效性临床试验。纳入73名肠造口患者,随机使用德舒妥或胜舒两件式造口袋。主要观察指标为造口周围皮炎未发生率,次要观察指标包括底盘渗漏程度、造口底盘平均使用时间、患者满意度。结果:观察组造口周围未发生皮炎的比例为69.4%(95%CI,51.9%~83.7%),对照组造口周围未发生皮炎的比例为66.7%(95%CI,49.0%~81.4%),两组间无统计学差异(P=0.8219)。两组间在底盘渗漏评分、造口底盘使用时间、受试者满意度、不良事件方面均无统计学差异。结论:与胜舒两件式造口袋相比,德舒妥两件式造口袋在造口周围皮炎、底盘渗漏程度、造口底盘使用时间以及患者满意度方面具有非劣效性。Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DeShuTuo two-piece ostomy appliance in patients with colostomies and whether they are non-inferior to Sensura two-piece ostomy appliance.Methods:A randomized,open,parallel,positive-controlled,multicenter,noninferiority trial was conducted in 73 patients with colostomies who were randomized to the use of either a DeShuTuo or a Sensura two-piece ostomy bag.The primary outcome was the absence of peristomal dermatitis,and the secondary outcomes included the degree of leakage,the average duration of stoma base use,and patient satisfaction.Results:The percentage of no peristomal dermatitis was 69.4%(95%CI,51.9%-83.7%)in the DeShuTuo group and 66.7%(95%CI,49.0%-81.4%)in the Sensura group,with no statistical difference between the two groups(P=0.8219).There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of leakage score,duration of stoma base use,participant satisfaction,or adverse events.Conclusion:Compared with the Sensura two-piece ostomy bag,the DeShuTuo two-piece ostomy bag was non-inferior in terms of peristomal dermatitis,degree of leakage,duration of stoma base use,and participant satisfaction.
分 类 号:TH779[机械工程—仪器科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120