超声刀与高频电刀在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用对比  

Comparison of Ultrasonic Knife and High-Frequency Electroknife in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

作　　者：马健 MA Jian(Tianjin Fourth Central Hospital,Tianjin 300000)

机构地区：[1]天津市第四中心医院,天津300000

出　　处：《中国医疗器械信息》2024年第19期150-152,共3页China Medical Device Information

摘　　要：目的:对比分析开展腹腔镜胆囊切除术时超声刀与高频电刀的应用效果。方法:选取2019年11月~2022年11月在医院接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗的患者56例为观察对象,以随机数字表法将患者分为观察组(n=28,治疗方法:超声刀腹腔镜胆囊切除术)与对照组(n=28,治疗方法:高频电刀腹腔镜胆囊切除术)。结果:观察组患者手术、术后排气和住院时间短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,两组患者差异显著,P<0.05。观察组患者对治疗效果的满意度与对照组患者相比明显较高,P<0.05。结论:在实施腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗的过程中超声刀的应用效果明显优于高频电刀,有助于患者的更好治疗。Objective:To analyze and compare the application effects of ultrasonic knives and high-frequency electroknives in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods:Selected patients who received laparoscopic cholecystectomy in hospital from November 2019 to November 2022,and a total of 56 cases were selected.The patients were divided into the observation group by random number table method(n=28,treatment methods:ultrasonic knife laparoscopic cholecystectomy)and comparison group(n=28,treatment method:high-frequency electroknife laparoscopic cholecystectomy).Results:The operation,postoperative exhaust and hospitalization time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group,and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group,the difference between the two groups was significant(P<0.05).The satisfaction of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the course of laparoscopic cholecystectomy,the application effect of ultrasonic knife is obviously better than that of high-frequency electroknife,which is conducive to better treatment of patients.

关 键 词：超声刀 高频电刀 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 术中出血量 

分 类 号：TH772[机械工程—仪器科学与技术]