余罪自首中“密切关联型”同种罪行的认定标准探析  

Identification Criteria of the"Closely Related Fact and Law"Crimes in Confession of Remaining Crime

作　　者：王喜娟[1] WANG Xijuan(Shanghai People′s Procuratorate,Shanghai 200020)

机构地区：[1]上海市人民检察院

出　　处：《犯罪研究》2024年第4期107-112,共6页Chinese Criminology Review

摘　　要：余罪自首的认定是目前司法实践中的一个难题,相关司法解释对于余罪自首的认定明确排除了“同种罪行”的供述,但“同种罪行”的认定标准事关余罪自首的成立范围。从与“自动投案”型自首相平衡,体现行为人认罪悔罪态度及节约司法资源等角度考量,“同种罪行”包括三种类型,各自的认定标准有所不同。其中“同罪名型”“选择性罪名型”属于法律拟制型同种罪行,包括同质不同宗罪行;“密切关联型”同种罪行则需具备基于同一罪行在事实上的密切关联,以及由罪行各要素关系所决定的罪名之间法律上的密切关联两个条件才能构成。The identification of the confession of remaining crime undiscovered is a difficult problem in the current judicial practice.In the judicial interpretation,the contents of the confession of the remaining crime eliminates"the same type of crime",and the identification criteria of"the same type of crime"become the key to identifying the confession of remaining crime.From the perspective of balancing this type of confession and voluntary surrender,and reflecting the attitude of confession and repentance and saving judicial resources,"the same type of crime"includes three classifications which have different identification criteria.Among them,the"same accusations"crimes and the"alternative accusations"crimes belong to the same type of crime based on legal fiction,which include different crimes of same nature;and the"closely related fact and law"crimes can only constitute the same type of crimes when they are closely related on facts based upon the same crime,and have close legal connection from the relationship of elements of the crime.

关 键 词：余罪自首 同种罪行 密切关联 认定标准 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]