“套路嫖”行为的不法诠释与罪责认定  

Illegal Interpretation and Criminal Liability Identification of“Routine Prostitution”

作　　者：王枫梧 Wang Fengwu(Hangzhou Public Security Bureau,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310002)

机构地区：[1]杭州市公安局,浙江杭州310002

出　　处：《警学研究》2024年第4期35-45,共11页Police Science Research

基　　金：中共浙江省委政法委员会、浙江省法学会法学研究课题“新型网络犯罪治理的问题与对策研究——以浙江省为例”(2021NB08);公安部公安理论及软科学研究计划项目“技术侦查证据使用与排除问题研究”(2017LLYJZJST042)的研究成果。

摘　　要：“套路嫖”不是规范的法律概念,而是实务界对于以提供虚假色情服务诱骗高额充值消费的一种形象描述,其行为方式隐蔽,法律关系刑民交织,近年备受理论界和实务界争议。“套路嫖”行为评价为诈骗罪予以刑事处罚,在不法层面上,存在“欺骗行为”“不法原因给付”“财产损失”等构成要件价值判断的争议聚焦;在罪责层面上,存在“非法占有目的”规范评价的法理聚讼。借鉴德、日等域外国家和地区相关刑法理论与刑事判例,进一步厘清“套路嫖”不法内涵与罪责边界,检视以诈骗罪规制“套路嫖”的法理适格性与现实妥当性,有利于推动案件的溯源治理、系统治理和综合治理。“Routine prostitution”is a non-standard legal concept,which lures high-value consumption by providing false pornographic services.Its behavior is concealed,and the legal relationship is intertwined between criminals and civilians,which is controversial in theory and practice.The behavior of“routine prostitution”is evaluated as a crime of fraud to be criminally punished.At the illegal level,there is a dispute over the value judgment of the constituent elements such as“deceptive behavior,”“payment for illegal reasons”and“property loss”;at the level of culpability,there is a normative evaluation of“purpose of illegal possession”.By drawing on the relevant criminal law theories and precedents of foreign countries such as Germany and Japan,we can further clarify the illegal connotation and boundary of criminal responsibility of“routine prostitution,”and examine the legal suitability and practical appropriateness,which is conducive to promoting the traceability,systematic and comprehensive governance of cases.

关 键 词：“套路嫖” 欺骗行为 不法原因给付 非法占有目的 

分 类 号：D918.5[政治法律—法学]