经济学CSSCI期刊论文“一文多注”的有效性研究  

Study on the Validity of the“Multiple Labeling”in the CSSCI Journal of Economics

作　　者：邓可 龙怡[2] DENG Ke;LONG Yi

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院经济管理学院,上海201701 [2]上海政法学院人工智能法学院,上海201701

出　　处：《图书情报导刊》2024年第10期74-79,共6页Journal of Library and Information Science

摘　　要：针对期刊论文的“一文多注”现象,采集了CSSCI中2018—2022年经济学期刊论文的基金资助数据和论文被引数据,通过相关分析和边际效应分析探讨基金资助对论文质量的影响。研究发现:基金数量和基金种类与论文被引量只呈现弱的正相关关系;边际效应分析显示,多项基金之间存在替代效应,互补效应不明显。因此,“一文多注”的有效性在理论上经不起检验。实践中,建议基金管理部门从基金资助效用出发,防止过度资助,同时期刊编辑部也应该避免“唯基金多寡论”来挑选论文。In view of the phenomenon of“multiple labeling”in journal papers,this paper collects the funding data and citation data of CSSCI papers from 2018-2022,and discusses the influence of funding on the quality of papers through correlation analysis and marginal effect analysis.It is found that there is only a weak positive correlation between the number of funds and the types of funds and the number of paper citations.Marginal effect analysis shows that there is substitution effect among multiple funds,but the complementary effect is not obvious.Therefore,the validity of“multiple labeling”cannot be tested theoretically.In practice,it is suggested that the fund management department should avoid over-funding according to the effectiveness of fund funding,and the journal editorial department should also avoid select-ing papers only on the basis of the amount of fund.

关 键 词：一文多注 不实标注 相关分析 边际效应分析 论文质量 

分 类 号：G311[文化科学]