检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁锋 YUAN Feng(School of Communication,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China)
出 处:《编辑之友》2024年第11期88-95,共8页Editorial Friend
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“人工智能出版物的法律保护创新性研究”(23CXW030)。
摘 要:随着人工智能技术在新闻出版领域的广泛应用,人工智能出版物法律保护的正当性与必要性问题日益凸显。作品保护、邻接权保护、反不正当竞争法保护、特设专门法保护等都为人工智能出版物的法律保护提供了可行性方案。其中作品保护、邻接权保护、反不正当竞争法保护都存在理论和制度上的逻辑困局。相对而言,特设无形财产权模式更具正当性和合理性,其不仅能够实现各方利益的平衡、进行科学的制度设计,而且也已经有了切实可行的实践范例。从立法的角度讲,未来相关部门应针对人工智能出版物构建一个特殊的无形财产权利机制,相关制度设计可类比现行的著作权法体系。With the widespread application of artificial intelligence technology in the field of publishing and communication,the legitimacy and necessity of legal protection for artificial intelligence publications have become increasingly prominent.Feasible solutions for the legal protection of artificial intelligence publications have been covered from the different aspects of work protection,neighboring rights protection,anti-unfair competition law protection,ad hoc special law protection,and etc.Among them,there are theoretical and institutional logical dilemmas in the protection of works,the protection of neighboring rights,and the protection of anti-unfair competition laws.In comparison,the ad hoc intangible property rights protection model is more legitimate and rational.It can not only achieve a balance of interests of all parties and carry out scientific system design,but also has typical practical examples.Future legislation should build a special intangible property rights mechanism for artificial intelligence publications,and the relevant system design can be an analogy for the current copyright law system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7