检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张齐林 孙伟增 ZHANG Qilin;SUN Weizeng(HSBC Business School,Peking University,Shenzhen 518055,Guangdong,China;Joint Research Institute,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing 211815,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学汇丰商学院,深圳518055 [2]南京审计大学联合研究院,南京211815
出 处:《地理研究》2024年第11期2847-2869,共23页Geographical Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(72274228、71903210)。
摘 要:数字政府建设对实现国家治理现代化、全面引领数字化发展具有重要意义。本文首次基于地方政府网站工作报表数据测算了2017-2022年中国337个地级及以上城市的数字政府发展水平,并深入研究了其时空演变规律和影响因素。研究发现,中国数字政府发展水平:①呈现出逐年提升态势,公共服务能力增速最快,其次为安全保障能力,最后是政务公开水平。②表现出东中西递减的地带性规律,且西部与东中部地区差距逐渐扩大。③具有显著空间集聚特征,且集聚程度随时间逐渐增加。④突显“核心-边缘”结构,发展水平较高的城市集中于较高行政等级和五大城市群地区城市。③在全国层面不存在收敛趋势,但三大地区内部差异有所缩小。③经济发展水平是影响数字政府发展的关键因素,城市人口规模、产业结构特征、政府财政能力和网络基础设施对各政府数字化指标及在不同地区呈现异质性影响。本研究为中国地方数字政府发展水平的测度提供了新的研究视角,对理解数字政府发展的特征具有重要意义。The construction of digital government stands as a cornerstone in the quest for national governance modernization and the holistic advancement of digital progress.This paper,for the first time,quantifies the extent of the digital government development level of 337 Chinese cities,encompassing all prefecture and higher-level administrations,spanning a period from 2017 through 2022.Utilizing comprehensive data extracted from work reports of local governments,this analysis delves into not only the temporal and spatial patterns of such developments but also the various factors that influence these trends.The findings of the study reveal that:(1)China's digital government development level shows a consistent year-on-year increasing trend with an average annual growth rate of 11.54%,with the fastest growth rate in public service capacity,followed by the security capacity,and finally the government transparency level.(2)Geographically,it presents a decreasing regional pattern in the eastern,central and western regions in terms of the digital government development level,and the gap between the western region and the other two regions is gradually widening.(3)It has significant spatial agglomeration characteristics,and the degree of this agglomeration gradually increases over the years.(4)It exhibits a clear"core-periphery"structure,where cities with higher digital government development levels are concentrated in the areas with higher administrative levels and five major urban agglomerations.(5)There is an absence of a trend towards convergence at the national level,but the internal differences within each of the three major regions have demonstrated a narrowing tendency.(6)The empirical analysis reveals that the economic development level emerges as a key factor affecting the digital government development level,and other influencing factors,including the urban population size,industrial structure characteristics,government fiscal capacity and network infrastructure,exhibit heterogeneous impacts on distinct government
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.187