机构地区:[1]江苏省东台市人民医院手术室,江苏省盐城市224200
出 处:《护理实践与研究》2024年第11期1727-1733,共7页Nursing Practice and Research
基 金:盐城市卫生健康委员会、盐城市科学技术局医学科技发展计划项目(编号:YK2020110)。
摘 要:目的探讨手术室温暖护理在急性结石性胆囊炎患者中的应用效果,旨在降低急性结石性胆囊炎手术患者身心应激反应。方法选取2021年1—12月江苏省东台市人民医院肝胆外科急性结石性胆囊炎患者80例作为研究对象,按照组间基线资料具有可比性原则分为对照组及观察组,每组40例。对照组患者给予常规护理,观察组患者给予手术室温暖护理。比较两组患者心理应激状态(焦虑、恐惧)、生理应激(心率、平均动脉压)、术后康复情况、护理满意度及Kolcaba舒适状况量表(GCQ)评分。结果术前1 d,两组患者阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑与信息量表(APAIS)、视觉模拟尺(VAS)评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术前5 min,两组患者APAIS、VAS评分均较术前1 d提高(观察组APAIS组内比较t=6.351,P=0.000;VAS组内比较t=6.043,P=0.000。对照组APAIS组内比较t=8.023,P=0.000;VAS组内比较t=8.492,P=0.000),且观察组患者APAIS、VAS评分低于对照组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。进入手术室等待间时,两组患者心率、平均动脉压比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。麻醉前5min,两组患者心率、平均动脉压均较进入手术室等待间时提高,组内比较差异有统计学意义(观察组心率组内比较t=4.328,P=0.000;观察组平均动脉压组内比较t=10.471,P=0.000。对照组心率组内比较t=10.471,P=0.000;观察组平均动脉压组内比较t=8.324,P=0.000),且观察组患者心率、平均动脉压均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者术后首次排气、肠鸣音恢复时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组下床活动时间以及住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者护理满意度高于对照组(P<0.05)。术前1 d,两组患者舒适度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后当天,两组患者舒适度评分较术前1 d提高(观察组组内比较t=24.805,P=0.000;对照组组内比较t=16.472,P=0Objective To explore the application effect of warm nursing in the operating room in patients with acute stone cholecystitis,aiming to reduce the physical and mental stress response of patients with acute stone cholecystitis surgery.Methods To select 80 patients with acute stone cholecystitis in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Dongtai People's Hospital admitted from January to December 2021 as the study objects,they were divided into a control group and an observation group according to the principle that baseline data between the groups were comparable,with 40 cases in each group.The patients in the control group were given conventional nursing care,and the patients in the observation group were given warm nursing care in the operating theatre.The two groups were compared in terms of psychological stress(anxiety,fear),physiological stress(heart rate,mean arterial pressure),postoperative recovery,nursing satisfaction and Kolcaba General Comfort Questionnaire(GCQ)score.Results 1 d before surgery,the difference between the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale(APAIS)and Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)scores of the two groups of patients was not statistically significant(P>0.05);5 min before surgery,the APAIS and VAS scores of the two groups of patients improved compared with 1 d before surgery(APAIS intra-group comparison of the Observation group t=6.351,P=0.000:VAS intra-group comparison of the observation group t=6.043,P=0.000.In the control group,APAIS intra-group comparison t=8.023,P=0.000:VAS intra-group comparison t=8.492,P=0.000),and APAIS and VAS scores of the patients in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the difference between the groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).Entering the waiting room of the operating room,there was no statistically significant difference in the comparison of heart rate and mean arterial pressure between the two groups(P>0.05).5 minutes before anaesthesia,the heart rate and mean arterial pressure of the two groups of p
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...