惩罚性赔偿补偿功能否定论  

The Negative Theory of the Compensatory Function of Punitive Damages

作　　者：黄娅琴[1] HUANG Yaqin(School of Law,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031,China)

机构地区：[1]南昌大学法学院,江西南昌330031

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2024年第5期107-118,共12页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国共产党司法政策百年发展史研究”(21DA120);江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目“智能汽车道路事故侵权责任研究”(FX20101)。

摘　　要：惩罚性赔偿的法哲学基础、核心价值、体系定位同补偿性损害赔偿在本质上不兼容。对惩罚性赔偿补偿功能的强调,容易模糊两者之间的界限,导致惩罚性赔偿被同质、滥用甚至虚置,削弱其作为法律制裁手段的特殊规制效力。作为公私法规范融合的典范,惩罚性赔偿不仅是对传统个人正义维护机制的一次重大突破,而且是法律体系中一道独特的风景线。要充分发挥惩罚性赔偿制度的价值,就必须坚持惩罚这一核心功能定位,摒弃可能将其引入传统损害赔偿模式窠臼的补偿功能。唯有如此,惩罚性赔偿方能真正发挥其震慑不法、维护诚信社会秩序的应有作用。The philosophical foundation,core value and system orientation of punitive damages are incompatible with the core idea of compensatory damages.If we overemphasize its compensatory function,the boundary between the two will be blurred,which will lead to the homogeneity,abuse and even the virtualization of punitive damages in practice and weaken its unique effect as a means of legal sanction.As an example of the integration of public and private law,punitive damages is not only a breakthrough in the traditional mechanism for upholding individual justice,but also a unique landscape in the legal system.In order to bring into play the value and uniqueness of punitive damages system,we must insist on the function orientation of punishment as the core,and abandon the compensation function that may lead it into the traditional pattern of damage compensation.Only in this way can punitive damages really play its due role in deterring lawlessness and maintaining social order of integrity.

关 键 词：惩罚性赔偿 补偿功能 民事赔偿 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]