检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈明 Chen Ming(Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学中国农村研究院,湖北武汉430079
出 处:《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2024年第6期50-55,共6页Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(22BZZ041)。
摘 要:在当前中国基层治理实践中,出现了“国家投入越多,成效却越来越低”的现象,其成因被解释为“官僚主义内卷”。如何走出“官僚主义内卷”成为推进中国基层治理现代化的实践难题之一。湖北省在推进基层治理现代化体制机制创新中,以“共同缔造”为方法,通过创新国家与社会双向供给公共服务的能力,完善国家与社会之间的利益联结机制,拓展共同空间的互动场域,提升参与的制度化水平和增强互动的仪式化频度,致力于构建共有习惯的社会治理共同体,逐渐孕育了“共同治理”的理论雏形。在共同治理中,国家与社会处于双向良性互动的状态,通过国家培育社会与社会反哺国家,实现国家自主性与社会自主性的有效结合。共同治理呈现出积极国家化的形态,这样既可以消解国家资源大量下沉与治理边际效益逐渐递减的困局,又能消除国家公共服务能力有限性与人民群众公共需求无限性之间的矛盾,有望走出“官僚主义内卷”的困局。In the current practice of grassroots governance in China,there has been a phenomenon of“the more the state invests,the lower the effectiveness”,which is explained as the“internal competition of bureaucracy”.How to overcome the“bureaucratic internal competition”has become one of the practical difficulties in promoting the modernization of grassroots governance in China.In promoting the modernization of grassroots governance system and mechanism innovation,Hubei Province adopts the method of“co-creation”to innovate the ability of the state and society to provide public services in both directions,improve the mechanism of interest linkage between the state and society,expand the interactive field of common space,enhance the institutionalization level of participation and the ritualistic frequency of interaction,and is committed to building a social governance community with common habits,gradually giving birth to the theoretical prototype of“co-governance”.In common governance,the state and society are in a mutually beneficial interaction,and through the state cultivating society and society giving back to the state,the effective combination of national autonomy and social autonomy is achieved.Joint governance presents a positive form of nationalization,which can not only alleviate the dilemma of a large amount of national resources sinking and the gradual decline of governance marginal benefits,but also eliminate the contradiction between the limited capacity of national public services and the infinite public needs of the people,and is expected to break out of the dilemma of“bureaucratic involution”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49