纯正网络犯罪司法适用的规范检视与法理调适  

Norm Review and Legal Adjustment of Judicial Application of Pure Cybercrime

作　　者：李栋[1] LI Dong(Department of Emergency Management,Guangdong Justice Police Vocational College,Guangzhou,Guangdong Province 510520,China)

机构地区：[1]广东司法警官职业学院应急管理系,广东广州510520

出　　处：《中国人民警察大学学报》2024年第11期60-67,共8页Journal of China People's Police University

摘　　要：三个纯正网络犯罪罪名的司法适用不仅引发罪名性质、与关联犯罪共犯的界分等难题,还因自身存在行为类型明确性不足、涵摄范围重合等问题而诱发“口袋罪”诘问与“同案不同判”风险。要纾解网络犯罪的刑事规制困境,可以将纯正网络犯罪的法益限定为网络公共秩序法益,在此采取单一制犯罪认定进路,区分纯正网络犯罪与“关联犯罪共犯”。与此同时,依托主体身份和行为样态分别限定三个纯正网络犯罪的构成要件,以此界分专属规制范围。The judicial application of three pure cybercrimes not only raises issues regarding the nature of these offenses and the delineation between them and their associated offenses,but also induces controversial“pocket crime”and the risk of“different sentences for the same case”due to the lack of clarity in specifying the typology and overlapping coverage.To alleviate the regulatory dilemma of cybercrime,this paper proposes specifying the legal benefit of pure cybercrime as cyberspace public order,and adopting a unitary approach to distinguish pure cybercrime from“their associated offenses”.At the same time,the exclusive regulatory scope of these three offenses should be limited to their three constituent elements from both the subject of the act and the type of act.

关 键 词：网络犯罪 独立成罪 网络公共秩序法益 单一制 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]