检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周权 吴志祥 ZHOU Quan;WU Zhi-xiang
机构地区:[1]国能神皖安庆皖江发电有限责任公司,安徽安庆246000
出 处:《节能》2024年第9期100-104,共5页Energy Conservation
摘 要:为了比较1 000 MW机组两机一塔项目的技术经济性,以安徽某电厂扩建项目2×1 000 MW机组为研究对象,拟定两机一塔高位塔方案、一机一塔高位塔方案、一机一塔常规塔方案,利用动态回收期法进行计算。结果显示,两机一塔高位塔方案的初投资增加4 661万元,可节约运行电费约716.63万元/年,按年利用时长4 750 h计算,动态投资回收期为8.1年,小于10年,两机一塔项目可行。In order to compare the technical and economic feasibility of the 1000 MW unit two unit one tower project,the 2×1000 MW unit of a power plant expansion project in Anhui Province taken as the research object,a two machine one tower high-level tower scheme,a one machine one tower high-level tower scheme,and a one machine one tower conventional tower scheme have been proposed.The scheme was calculated by using the dynamic payback period method.The results show that the initial investment of the two machine one tower high-level tower scheme increases by 46.61 million yuan,which can save about 7.1663 million yuan per year in operating electricity costs.Calculated based on an annual utilization hour of 4750 hours,the dynamic investment payback period is 8.1 years,which is less than 10 years.Therefore,the two machine one tower project is feasible.
分 类 号:TK262[动力工程及工程热物理—动力机械及工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70