《文选》选文指向与其“破例”问题的思考——《文选》选文标准研究之三  

Reflections on the direction of selected works in Wen Xuan and its exception:The second part of“the study of the standard of selecting articles in Wenxuan”

作　　者：周春艳 Zhou Chunyan(School of literature,Guizhou Nationalities University,Guiyang 550025,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学文学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《六盘水师范学院学报》2024年第5期74-82,共9页Journal of Liupanshui Normal University

基　　金：贵州民族大学博士科研启动项目“文体嬗变视域下的《文选》‘文’编纂研究”(GZMUSK[2024]QD69);国家社会科学基金一般项目“《文选》五臣李善二家注论衡”(19BZW061);河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“汉魏六朝文学中的天文书写研究”(2022CWX048)。

摘　　要：《文选》之编纂,从选文目的、范围乃至文体分类看,皆自成体例。通观全书不难发现,其中不乏破例之举:因“美”之故,录少量“经、子、史”;因“人事”虑,非美文而得以入选;“体”亦非一,部分文体可分而不再分;因“整体”故,将左思《三都赋序》置于“赋”类而非“序”体,又为“骚”独设一体。凡此种种,足见“一以贯之”实难,即理论纲领和实际操作之间往往存在差距,且该现象不独《文选》,其他古籍亦普遍存在。The compilation of Wenxuan has its own style in terms of the purpose,scope and classification of the selected works.However,it is not difficult to find a comprehensive view of the book,one of the many“Exceptions”,for example,because of“Beau-ty”,recorded a small number of“Jing,Zi,Shi”;because of“Personnel”considerations,not a good article and was selected;“Style”is not one,part of the style can be divided and no longer divided;because of“Integrity”,the preface to Fu by Zuo Si is placed in the category of“Fu”instead of“Preface”,which is also a unique body for“Sao”.All this shows that“Consistent”is difficult,that is,there is often a gap between the theoretical program and the actual operation,and this phenomenon is not only Wenxuan,other an-cient books also exist universally.

关 键 词：《文选》 选文标准 破例 理论与实际 差距 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]