斜坡式防波堤中英设计方法对比研究  

Comparison of design methods of rubble mound breakwater between Chinese and British codes

作　　者：王亥索[1,2] 刘铭祎 WANG Haisuo;LIU Mingyi(Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering,M.O.T.,Tianjin 300456,China;Tianjin Survey and Design Institute for Water Transport Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Tianjin 300456,China)

机构地区：[1]交通运输部天津水运工程科学研究院,天津300456 [2]天津水运工程勘察设计院有限公司,天津300456

出　　处：《水运工程》2024年第11期71-78,共8页Port & Waterway Engineering

摘　　要：国内设计单位在海外斜坡式防波堤建设中,常用的设计方法主要参照中国的JTS 154—2018《防波堤与护岸设计规范》和英标BS 6349-7。由于设计方法的差异,使国内规范的国际化应用存在一定的局限性。结合这两本设计规范,采用对比分析法对斜坡堤的波浪、断面、胸墙、边坡、护面块体、垫层块石、抛石棱体、护底及潜堤等设计方法进行论述。结果表明,两者差异主要体现在设计理念、计算公式与参数、构造要求等方面,这些差异反映了两国在防波堤设计领域的不同发展水平和工程实践特点。通过对比研究的结果,可以更好地理解和应用这些差异,为国内外的防波堤设计工作提供更科学的合理化建议。In the construction of overseas rubble mound breakwaters by domestic design firms,the commonly used design codes mainly include the Chinese JTS 154—2018 Code for Design of Breakwater and Revetment and the British code BS 6349-7.Due to the differences between the two design methods,there are certain limitations in the international application of domestic codes.Combining with the two design codes,we use the comparative analysis method to discuss the design methods of wave,section structures,breast wall,slope,protective surface block,cushion block stone,riprap prism,bottom protection and submerged dike of rubble mound breakwater.The results show that the differences between the two codes are mainly reflected in the design concept,calculation formula and parameters,and structural requirements.These differences reflect the different development levels and engineering practice characteristics of the two countries in the field of breakwater design.Through the results of comparative study,we can better understand and apply these differences,and provide more scientific and reasonable suggestions for the design of breakwaters at home and abroad.

关 键 词：斜坡式防波堤 中国规范和英国标准 设计方法 标准对比 

分 类 号：U656.2[交通运输工程—港口、海岸及近海工程]