检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨子琪 YANG Zi-qi(Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,China)
出 处:《黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报》2024年第6期7-11,共5页Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering
摘 要:土壤是构成生态环境的重要要素,在维持生态系统稳定性方面起着举足轻重的作用。我国2019年正式施行的《土壤污染防治法》为确定土壤污染修复的责任主体提供了法律依据,但仍存在许多问题,导致在司法实践中可操作性不强。德国拥有比较先进的土壤污染制度,积累了丰富的立法和实践经验。从责任主体范围、认定责任主体责任内容、多种责任主体竞合的角度将我国与德国的相关规定进行对比,在借鉴德国的土壤治理责任主体制度的基础上,结合我国目前发展状况,就加强和完善我国的土壤污染治理责任主体的相关制度提出了对策。The Soil pollution prevention and control law came into effect on January 1,2019.It offers legal basis for determining the party responsible for remedying soil pollution.However,there are still a number of problems that lead to a lack of functionality in case law.Germany has a relatively advanced soil protection system and has rich legislative and practical experience.Compare the content in China with the relevant regulations in Germany based on the scope of the responsible party,the content of the responsible party,and the competition and cooperation between several responsible parties.Based on the current situation of land management accountability in Germany and China,propose ways to strengthen and improve the effectiveness of land management accountability.
关 键 词:土壤污染修复法律制度 责任主体 比较研究
分 类 号:X37[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.85.79