涉外定牌加工商标侵权纠纷裁判路径反思与矫正  

Reflection and Rectification on the Judgment Path of Foreign-related Processing Trademarks Infringement

作　　者：刘润涛 LIU Run-tao(Shanghai University of International Business and Economics,Shanghai 201620,China)

机构地区：[1]上海对外经贸大学法学院,上海201620

出　　处：《上海对外经贸大学学报》2024年第6期66-78,共13页Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics

基　　金：2023年度上海市哲学社会科学规划课题“国际投资条约知识产权保护变革及中国应对”(项目编号:2023BFX004)的资助。

摘　　要：涉外定牌加工商标侵权纠纷裁判标准,经历了从严格遵循商标权地域性和专有权绝对保护,向保障商标功能发挥和防止来源混淆的转变。在理论与具体实践中,围绕涉外定牌加工贴附的商标标志是否属于商标使用行为、容易导致相关公众混淆,境内加工方主观过错对商标侵权判定的影响等问题争论不断,既有裁判结果在侵权与否间不停摇摆。坚持商标权地域性,认定涉外定牌加工构成商标使用且商标使用直接主体为境外委托方,运用商标侵权判定一般规则与驰名商标保护特殊规则,强化诚实信用原则的适用,在境外委托方构成直接侵权的基础上,审查境内加工方是否尽到合理的注意义务,判定其是否构成间接侵权。The judgment of trademark infringement disputes related to foreign trademark processing has undergone a shift from strictly adhering to temritoriality and absolute protection of trademark exclusive rights to focus on ensuring the play of trademark function and preventing source confusion.In theory and practice,there have been debates about whether foreign trademark processing is a trademark use behavior,which can easily lead to confusion among the relevant public,and how does subjective fault impact on trademark infringement judgment.The judgments fluctuate between infringement and non-infringement.Adhere to the regional nature of trademark rights,determine foreign trademark processing constituting trademark use,and identify the direct subject of trademark use as the overseas commissioning party.Use the general rules for trademark infringement judgment and the special rules for well-known trademark protection,strengthen the application of the principle of good faith.Based on the basis of direct infringement by the overseas commissioning party,review whether the domestic processing party has fulfilled reasonable care obligations and determine whether it constitutes indirect infringement.

关 键 词：涉外定牌加工 商标使用 地域性 直接侵权 间接侵权 

分 类 号：D923.43[政治法律—民商法学]