检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱敏敏[1] 唐豫 宋法明[1] Zhu Minmin;Tang Yu;Song Faming(Civil Aviation Flight University of China,Guanghan 618307 Sichuan China)
出 处:《中国民航飞行学院学报》2024年第6期66-70,共5页Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费基金面上项目(J2023-020)。
摘 要:为了找到切实可行的注视模式,揭示不同水平的飞盘选手的视觉搜索方式和注视信息,基于“专家和新手”范式的基础上,使用穿戴式眼动仪,采用横向追踪研究设计,通过对比专家和新手的不同眼动特征,对不同水平飞盘选手注视比赛时的实景图片的眼动特征进行研究。研究结果发现:专家组在信息加工效率、视觉搜索上与新手组呈现出显著性差异(P<0.05),专家组具有更优越的信息加工能力和视觉搜索模式,注视点集中且主次分明。研究为提升飞盘选手的预判和决策能力提供了一种可行的方案。In order to find a feasible gaze pattern that reveals the visual search and gaze information of Frisbee players with different levels,a cross-sectional tracking study is designed to compare the different eye movement characteristics of experts and novices.Based on the"expert and novice"paradigm,a cross-sectional tracking study design with a wearable eye-tracking device is used to investigate the eye-movement characteristics of Frisbee players with different levels when gazing at real-life pictures during a match by comparing the different eye-movement characteristics of experts and novices.The results of the study find that the expert group present significant differences in information processing efficiency and visual search with the novice group(P<0.05),and the expert group have superior information processing ability and visual search patterns with focused and prioritized gaze points.The study provides a feasible solution to improve the anticipation and decisionmaking ability of Frisbee players.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.193.179