检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱云志 Yunzhi Zhu(Yunnan University for Nationalities,Kunming Yunnan)
机构地区:[1]云南民族大学,云南昆明
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第10期6066-6072,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:取保候审制度是我国刑事诉讼强制措施之一,它包含了保障人权、保障诉讼顺利进行、维护司法公正的功能。取保候审制度的实施有效节约了我国大量的司法资源。但由于取保候审所存在的立法缺陷,导致取保候审的适用率较低,在司法实践当中也存在适用困难的问题。本文通过对英国保释制度的探究,从中汲取保障人权的相关理念。并且从我国取保候审在司法实践以及立法上存在的缺陷为切入点,从完善取保候审的立法缺陷、构建完善的监督机制以及解决取保候审在司法实践中存在的难实行的问题进行思考,从而对我国取保候审做出理论和司法实践方面做出完善。The system of bail pending trial is one of the compulsory measures of criminal procedure in China,which contains the functions of guaranteeing human rights,ensuring the smooth proceeding of lit-igation and maintaining judicial justice.The implementation of the system saves a lot of judicial resources in China.However,due to the legislative defects in the bail pending trial,the application rate of the system is low,and there are also problems in judicial practice.Through the exploration of the British bail system,this paper draws relevant concepts of protecting human rights from it.Moreover,this paper will address the deficiencies in China’s bail system from both judicial practice and legislation as a starting point.It will reflect on improving legislative shortcomings,establishing a comprehensive supervision mechanism,and addressing the practical challenges of implementing bail in judicial practice,ultimately aiming to enhance both the theoretical and practical aspects of the bail system in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171