《暾欲谷碑》所见开元初突厥政局  

The political landscape of Turkic Khaganate at the beginning of Kai-yuan(开元)era as seen from the Tonyukuk inscriptions

作　　者：陈浩 Chen Hao

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学人文学院历史系

出　　处：《西域研究》2024年第4期127-138,169,共13页The Western Regions Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“察合台文《突厥蛮世系》的汉译与研究”(项目编号:22BMZ113)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：开元四年(716)突厥汗国的政局动荡,是观察7~8世纪欧亚政治秩序演进的重要节点。牵涉其中的核心人物之一暾欲谷在政变前后的相关事迹,在汉文史料中仅有寥寥几句,但其纪功碑却蕴含了丰富信息,故《暾欲谷碑》成为理解这段历史的关键文本。若将突厥碑文放置于具体的历史语境中解读,则《暾欲谷碑》的刻立时间,碑文何以聚焦于骨咄禄一朝史实,以及开篇第一行何以用大号字刻写等问题,都可以得到圆满解决。同一政治语境,也能够解释参与政变的另一核心人物阙特勤的纪功碑叙事何以止于开元四年的异常现象。The political turmoil of the Turkic Khaganate in the 4^(th)year of the Kai-yuan(开元)era(716 CE)marks a pivotal point for understanding the evolvement of political order in Eurasia during the 7^(th)and 8^(th)centuries.One of the central figures involved in this political upheaval,Tonyukuk,is only briefly mentioned in Chinese historical sources;however,a wealth of information was recorded by his commemorative stele.As such,the Tonyukuk inscriptions becomes a key context in interpreting the historical events during this period.By contextualising the Turkish inscription in its specific historical setting,issues such as the timing of the stele's erection,its focus on the reign of Ilterish Qapaghan,and the reason for using large characters in the first line of the inscription can all be satisfactorily resolved.The same political setting also explained why the narrative on the commemorative stele of another key figure in the coup,Kul Tigin,abruptly ends in the 4^(th)year of the Kai-yuan era.

关 键 词：突厥 暾欲谷 阙特勤 后突厥汗国 

分 类 号：K289[历史地理—历史学]