反垄断民事公益诉讼制度的理论依据及实践进路  

Theoretical Basis and Practical Progress of Anti-monopoly Civil Public Interest Litigation System

作　　者：杨成广 Yang Chengguang(Civil,Commercial and Economic Law School,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《梧州学院学报》2024年第5期12-19,共8页Journal of Wuzhou University

基　　金：甘肃省2023年度哲学社会科学规划项目(2023QN038);国家检察官学院2023年度科研基金资助项目(GJY2023NY21)。

摘　　要：在反垄断领域引入公益诉讼制度不仅契合反垄断实施要求,还有利于保障反垄断公平,完善反垄断实施机制,促进反垄断监管常态化监管。根据我国《反垄断法》规定,只有检察机关有权提起反垄断民事公益诉讼,由于检察机关的特殊性和反垄断专业性的要求,反垄断民事公益诉讼制度应发挥“补位”作用,在维护反垄断公益的基础上,兼顾私益保护。在具体的制度设计上,既要发挥检察职能,推进民事公益诉讼实施,又要防止权能异化,损害当事人合法权益。The introduction of public interest litigation system in the field of anti-monopoly not only meets the requirements of anti-monopoly implementation,but also helps to safeguard the fairness of anti-monopoly,improve the mechanism of anti-monopoly implementation,and promote normalized supervision.According to Anti-monopoly Law of the People′s Republic of China,only the procuratorate has the right to initiate anti-monopoly civil public interest litigation.Due to the special nature of the procuratorate and the requirements of anti-monopoly specialization,the anti-monopoly civil public interest litigation system should play the role of a“complementary”function,and take into account the protection of private interests on the basis of safeguarding the public interest of anti-monopoly.In terms of specific system design,it is necessary to give full play to the function of the procuratorate to promote the implementation of civil public interest litigation,but also to prevent the alienation of power to the detriment of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties.

关 键 词：反垄断法 私人实施 公共实施 公益诉讼 

分 类 号：D922.29[政治法律—经济法学]