检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王子聪 任青梅 Wang Zicong;Ren Qingmei(School of Political Science and Public Administration,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 102249,China;School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 102249)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学政治与公共管理学院,北京102249 [2]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京102249
出 处:《机电兵船档案》2024年第5期11-15,共5页
摘 要:理论层面,我国档案学界的电子档案规范与法学界的电子证据规范存在张力;实践层面,电子档案证据的应然效力与实然效力也存在差距。文章旨在探求电子档案作为电子证据使用时存在的实践困境与效力提升对策。在分析现行法律法规和行业规范的基础上,从事前取证、管理制度、技术保障等方面提出对策建议,使电子档案符合《档案法》中“来源可靠、程序规范、要素合规”的要求,进而充分发挥电子档案的证据效力。Theoretical tensions exist between the norms of electronic archival and electronic evidence in the legal sphere.In practical terms,there is a disparity between the anticipated and actual impact of electronic archival evidence.This paper aims to investigate the practical challenges associated with using electronic archives as evidence and propose measures to enhance their effectiveness.By analyzing current laws,regulations,and industry standards,recommendations are made for improvements in pre-forensics,management systems,technical support,etc.,in order to ensure that electronic archives comply with the requirements of"reliable source,standard procedures,and element compliance"outlined in the Archives Law and fully realize their evidentiary potential.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49