检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨洪波 付茂海[1] 夏康星 刘元鹏 YANG Hong-bo;FU Mao-hai;XIA Kang-xing;LIU Yuan-peng(School of Mechanical Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China)
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学机械工程学院,四川成都610031
出 处:《机械工程与自动化》2024年第6期99-101,共3页Mechanical Engineering & Automation
摘 要:利用Hypermesh软件和ANSYS软件对钢铝混合铆接结构进行联合仿真,通过对比分析MPC接触算法和梁单元模拟两种方法与实体建模方法之间结果的差异,寻找较为准确模拟铆钉结构的有限元分析方法。研究结果表明:在三种铆接连接中铆钉常见受力工况下,和实体单元模型相比,梁单元模型最小误差为2.44%,MPC接触算法模型最小误差为6.46%。因此按照梁单元模型模拟铆钉更为贴近实际情况,同时能够节省大量计算时间,提高计算效率。Hypermesh software and ANSYS software were used to co-simulate the steel-aluminum hybrid riveted structure,this study contrasts and analyzes the discrepancies in outcomes between the MPC contact algorithm and beam element simulation approaches versus the solid modeling technique.The objective is to identify a more accurate method for simulating rivets structural finite element analysis.The findings reveal that,under typical loading conditions for riveted connections,compared to the solid element model,the minimum error for the beam element model is 2.44%,while the MPC contact algorithm model exhibits a minimum error of 6.46%.Consequently,employing the beam element model for simulating rivets is deemed to be more in line with true scenarios.At the same time,it can save a lot of computing time and improve computing efficiency.
分 类 号:TP391.7[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.176.186