权利束对财产权范式的贡献及不足——以资源配置效率为视角  

The Contribution and Limitations of the Bundle of Rights to the Property Rights Paradigm--A Perspective from Resource Allocation Efficiency

作　　者：付翠英[1] 谭雯玲 FU Cui-ying;TAN Wen-ling(School of Law,Beihang University,Beijing 100191,China)

机构地区：[1]北京航空航天大学法学院,北京100191

出　　处：《内蒙古社会科学》2024年第6期70-78,共9页Inner Mongolia Social Sciences

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助课题“虚拟财产的私法调整规范研究”(编号:KG16304501)。

摘　　要：随着科技的进步,越来越多的新型资源被纳入财产的范畴。受制于“物债二分”与“物权法定”思维,传统财产权范式的弊端逐渐显露。区别于传统财产权范式,权利束在整合霍菲尔德权利概念与科斯产权理论的基础上,将财产拟制为法律关系的集合,且允许有关主体根据案件情况重新排列每束权利的顺位。通过个案决策,权利束能够更灵活地分配财产权益,但权利束也存在“增加交易成本”“打击劳动者生产积极性”等弊端。借助类型化的分析,权利束与传统财产权范式在不同类型财产的资源配置中呈现出差异化的优势与不足。With technological advancements,an increasing number of new types of resources are being incorporated into the category of property.However,constrained by the dichotomy of right in rem and right in personam,as well as the rigid mindset of numerus clausus,the drawbacks of the traditional property rights paradigm are gradually becoming apparent.In contrast to the traditional paradigm,the bundle of rights approach,which integrates Hohfeldian analysis of rights and Coasian property theory,conceptualizes property as a collection of legal relations and allows relevant parties to rearrange the priority of each right in the bundle according to the specifics of the case.Through case-based decision-making,the bundle of rights enables more flexible allocation of property interests.On the other hand,it also has drawbacks,such as increasing transaction costs and discouraging labor productivity.By employing typological analysis,the bundle of rights and the traditional property rights paradigm exhibit differentiated strengths and weaknesses in the allocation of resources across different types of property.

关 键 词：财产权 权利束 有形财产 无形财产 虚拟财产 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学] F091.348[经济管理—政治经济学]