国家事权理念下深化教材治理的法治保障进路  

Legal Guarantee in Deepening Governance of Teaching Materials under Concept of State Authority

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王芳[1] WANG Fang(Jilin Police College,Changchun 130117,China)

机构地区:[1]吉林警察学院治安系,吉林长春130117

出  处:《通化师范学院学报》2024年第11期46-54,共9页Journal of Tonghua Normal University

基  金:吉林省教育科学“十四五”规划项目“‘新工科、新文科’背景下公安院校专业交叉的实践教学体系研究”(GH22106)。

摘  要:国家事权理念下,我国教材治理呈现出行政权力优位、司法权力孱弱的非均衡式治理结构。单一行政治理逻辑下的有限性和滞后性等局限,亟须司法权介入以实现教材治理格局的均衡发展。教材治理中蕴含着国家和社会公共利益,以教育公益诉讼填补教材治理的司法空白,符合积极稳妥拓展公益诉讼受案范围的政策导向和公益诉讼的制度价值。在功能定位上,应明确公益诉讼作为行政执法的补充治理机制,实现行政权和司法权在维护公共利益领域的有效配合。在制度构造上,应明确检察机关作为公益诉讼的适格原告,并将检察建议作为起诉的前置程序,明确依法召回并处置教材、赔礼道歉、消除影响和有条件的损害赔偿等责任承担方式。Under the concept of state authority,my country's teaching materials governance presents an un-balanced governance structure in which administrative power is superior and judicial power is weak.Due to the limitations and hysteresis of a single administrative governance logic,the intervention of judicial power is urgently needed to achieve a balanced development of the teaching materials governance pattern.Teaching materials governance contains national and social public interests,and the use of educational pub-lic interest litigation to fill the judicial gap in teaching materials governance is in line with the policy orien-tation of actively and steadily expanding the scope of public interest litigation cases and the institutional value of public interest litigation.In terms of functional positioning,the functional positioning of public in-terest litigation as a supplementary mechanism for administrative supervision should be clarified,so as to realize the effective cooperation between administrative power and judicial power in the field of safeguard-ing public interests.In terms of system structure,it should be clear that the procuratorial organs are quali-fied plaintiffs in public interest litigation,and the procuratorial suggestions should be used as the pre-proce-dure of prosecution,and the responsibility methods such as recalling and disposing of teaching materials,making apologies,eliminating influence and conditional damage compensation should be clearly defined.

关 键 词:教育公益诉讼 国家事权 教材治理 法治保障 

分 类 号:D922[政治法律—法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象