证据开示与检察官职业伦理——兼论我国证据开示制度的二元建构  

Evidence disclosure and prosecutors’professional ethics——On the construction of a dual model of evidence disclosure system in China

作　　者：杨令一 Yang Lingyi(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学,北京100088

出　　处：《证据科学》2024年第5期621-631,共11页Evidence Science

摘　　要：司法实践中存在着检察官过度当事人化、客观义务销蚀的现象。为消除此现象,《检察官法》要求检察官履行职责应当秉持客观公正立场。证据开示既是客观公正的题中之意,也是独立的检察官伦理义务。与此同时,司法改革文件提出了探索建立证据开示制度的要求。在此背景下,改革方案应当根据刑事庭审实质化与认罪认罚程序的不同需要,分别在庭前会议环节与审查起诉环节构建不同的证据开示程序,以保障控辩平等、实现裁判公正。为保证证据开示得以顺利进行,有必要明确侦查机关、检察机关的证据保管义务。In the judicial practice,there exists the phenomenon that the prosecutor is excessively representing the litigant,and his objective obligation is eroded.To eliminate this phenomenon,the Prosecutor Law requires that prosecutors should uphold an objective and impartial position in performing their duties.Evidence disclosure is not only within the meaning of being objective and impartial,but also the ethical obligation shouldered by independent prosecutors.At the same time,in the official documents that advocate judicial reform,the reformers put forward the requirements for exploring the establishment of the discovery system.In this context,the reform plan should take consideration of different requisites for substantialized criminal trials and the procedure of guilty plea,and contain a construction of discovery procedures respectively in the pre-trial hearing and the issuance of complaint,in order to guarantee the equality of arms between prosecution and defense,and realize a fair trial.To ensure the discovery procedure being successfully conducted,it is also necessary to clarify the investigative organs’and prosecutorial organs’obligation in evidence preservation.

关 键 词：检察官职业伦理 证据开示 伦理义务 二元模式 证据保管义务 

分 类 号：D918.9[政治法律—法学]