检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郎琳 吴瑜[1,2] 王玉 姚希[1,2] 荀敬 Lin Lang;Yu Wu;Yu Wang;Xi Yao;Jing Xun(Department of Digestive Surgery,Tianjin Nankai Hospital,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300100,China;Tianjin Key Laboratory of Acute Abdomen Disease Associated Organ Injury and ITCWM Repair,Tianjin 300102,China;Institute of Integrative Medicine for Acute Abdominal Diseases,Tianjin 300074,China)
机构地区:[1]天津医科大学南开临床学院胃肠外科,300100 [2]天津市急腹症器官损伤与中西医修复重点实验室,300102 [3]天津市中西医结合急腹症研究所,300074
出 处:《中华胃食管反流病电子杂志》2024年第2期81-84,共4页Chinese Journal Of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(Electronic Edition)
基 金:天津市卫生健康委员会中医药重点领域项目(2020009);天津南开-金域合作专项(NKYY-IIT-2022-009-6)。
摘 要:目的比较达芬奇机器人与传统腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2021年12月至2023年12月天津市南开医院行达芬奇机器人手术(38例)和传统腹腔镜手术(42例)食管裂孔疝患者的临床资料。比较2组患者手术情况、术后临床终点指标及术后并发症发生情况。结果与传统腹腔镜组比,机器人组手术时间略长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者术中出血量、术后进食时间、术后住院时间、总住院费用、总住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);随访1~12个月,生活质量评分比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论达芬奇机器人手术治疗食管裂孔疝是安全有效的,其在术中出血量、术后进食时间、术后住院时间、总住院费用、总住院时间、术后并发症方面对比传统腹腔镜手术无明显差异。Objective To compare the clinical outcomes between da Vinci robot-assisted surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of hiatal hernia.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 38 patients who underwent da Vinci robot-assisted surgery and 42 patients who underwent traditional laparoscopic surgery for hiatal hernia in Tianjin Nankai Hospital between December 2021 and December 2023.Compare the surgical situation,postoperative clinical endpoint indicators,and incidence of postoperative complications between two groups.Results Compared with the traditional laparoscopic group,the da Vinci robot group had slightly longer operation time,which was statistically significant(P<0.05);there were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative blood loss,postoperative diet time,postoperative hospital stay,total hospitalization cost,and total hospitalization time between the two groups(all P>0.05).Conclusion Da Vinci robot-assisted surgery is a safe and effective treatment for hiatal hernia,and it shows no significant differences compared to traditional laparoscopic surgery in terms of intraoperative blood loss,postoperative diet time,postoperative hospital stay,total hospitalization cost,total hospitalization time,and postoperative complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.127.79