检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Miles Xavier
机构地区:[1]University of Calgary,Calgary,Canada
出 处:《US-China Law Review》2024年第8期394-404,共11页美中法律评论(英文版)
摘 要:Throughout discussions of the geopolitical conflict in the South China Sea(SCS),analysts tend to shy away from using the term“armed conflict”to describe actions taken within the maritime domain.Analysts have relegated such actions to the“gray zone”;a legal ambiguity between the threshold reaching an armed attack and the threshold for reaching an armed conflict.This essay argues that the law of armed conflict(LOAC,commonly referred to as international humanitarian law or IHL)actively regulates more actions in the SCS than some legal analysts let on,and that the LOAC is best suited to regulate actions over that of strictly maritime law.Through an analysis of various incidents between claimants in the SCS,it is revealed that the LOAC effectively lowers the threshold for reaching a state of armed conflict,allowing for more firm arbitrations to be made on the basis of constituting armed attacks rising to the level of armed conflict,as well as determining contributions to an armed conflict.
关 键 词:gray zone conflict South China Sea armed conflict thresholds
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49