检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:岳圣淞 Yue Shengsong
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院亚太与全球战略研究院,北京100007
出 处:《亚太安全与海洋研究》2024年第6期20-35,I0002,共17页Asia-Pacific Security and Maritime Affairs
基 金:国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“政治修辞与美国对华政策的调整”(编号:20FYB028);中国社会科学院登峰战略优势学科“中国周边研究”(编号:2023DFYSQQY01)。
摘 要:中美战略博弈的持续深化,使得制度性权力成为国际关系行为体实现自身战略目标、参与全球治理、维护国际体系稳定运行的核心关切。通过对国际关系中制度性权力认知的学理性溯源,并结合对历史上大国竞争中制度性权力互动行为的分析发现,主流范式对制度性权力的运作机制认知存在明显不足,对中美战略博弈背后制度性权力流转的重要影响缺乏应有的关注。话语权力是支撑制度性权力得以发挥作用的重要载体,也是制度性权力实践的重要手段。作为尚处于崛起进程中的中国来说,应充分认识到制度话语权对中国实现国际地位与影响力提升的重要意义,并围绕话语权力的获取展开积极的理论与政策探索,为实现自身发展营造正向的国际制度环境。The continuous intensification of strategic competition between China and the United States has made institutional power become the core concern the international relations actors to participate in global governance,achieve their own strategic goals,and maintain the stable operation of the international system.Through the perspective of institutional power in international relations,and combined with the analysis of the practice of institutional power competition in reality,this paper argues that the discourse power is an important carrier to support the institutional power to play its role,and also an important means of institutional power practice.An emerging power like China should be fully aware of the importance of institutional discourse power in promoting its international status and influence,and carry out positive theoretical and policy exploration around the acquisition of discourse power,so as to create a positive international institutional environment for the realization of its own development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147