检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐琳[1] 周佳雯 李庆功[2] XU Lin;ZHOU Jiawen;LI Qinggong(School of Law,Hangzhou Dianzi University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018,China;College of Teacher Education,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua Zhejiang 321004,China)
机构地区:[1]杭州电子科技大学法学院,浙江杭州310018 [2]浙江师范大学教师教育学院,浙江金华321004
出 处:《杭州电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第5期73-78,共6页Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi University:Social Sciences
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(20YJC840033)。
摘 要:以中国知网数据库中收录的教育信任领域的研究论文为样本,利用知识可视化软件(CiteSpace)对教育信任研究的热点内容与演进趋势进行分析。发现该领域的研究热点包括社会资本、大学生、社会信任、师生关系、教师、信任危机、人际信任等;教育信任的研究视角从微观逐渐向中观和宏观方向发展;对教育信任的理解逐步嵌入更广阔的社会空间;区块链是教育信任的研究前沿。针对目前教育信任研究存在的问题,建议加强对教育数字化环境中教育信任的研究,引入多样化的实证研究方法,推动教育信任研究往纵深方向发展。Utilizing research papers in the domain of educational trust indexed in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)database as our sample,this study analyzes the hot topics and evolutionary trends within the field through the application of the knowledge visualization software,CiteSpace.The identified research hotspots include social capital,college students,social trust,teacher-student relationships,educators,trust crises,and interpersonal trust.Notably,the research perspectives on educational trust have progressively transitioned from micro-level analyses to meso-and macro-level investigations.Moreover,the comprehension of educational trust is increasingly being situated within a broader societal framework.Blockchain technology stands out as a cutting-edge area of research within educational trust.In addressing the prevalent challenges in educational trust research,we propose enhancing research efforts on educational trust within the context of digital education environments,incorporating diversified empirical methodologies,and fostering deeper advancements in the field.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.8