检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张鹏 ZHANG Peng
机构地区:[1]广东财经大学公共管理学院,广东广州510030
出 处:《华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第6期213-223,共11页Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学基金项目“政策范式”理论下宅基地制度变迁的目标重置和实现机制研究(21YJA630114)。
摘 要:霍尔认为政策范式是用以制定和理解创建公共政策的指导原则或理念,是政策背后的大致目标,该理论的核心是将政策范式解构为“目标−工具选择−工具设置”。当前中国所进行的宅基地制度改革正处于政策范式的“第三阶”,是对政策目标和理念的重大转换。基于霍尔理论在宅基地政策领域的适用性改造,构建了一个宅基地改革的“背景−目标函数−预算约束−政策设计”理论框架,然后对各地改革试点所遵循的工具维度和所采取的探索措施进行归类分析,认为在资源约束下,设定政策目标,通过创新政策工具,实现对目标的最优化,是目前宅基地改革试点的内在逻辑。Hall argues that policy paradigm serves as the guiding principle or concept for formulating and understanding the creation of public policies,representing the general objectives behind the policies.The core of this theory is to deconstruct the policy paradigm into“objective-tool selection-tool configuration”.The ongoing reform of the homestead land system in China is currently at the“third stage”of the policy paradigm,which is a major transformation in policy objectives and concepts.Building on Hall’s theory,this paper conducts an applicability transformation in the field of homestead policy and constructs a theoretical framework for homestead reform consisting“context-objective function-budget constraintpolicy design”.It then classifies and analyzes the tool dimensions followed by reform pilots in various places and the exploratory measures taken,concluding that under resource constraints,establishing policy objectives and optimizing these objectives through innovative policy tools is the inherent logic of the current homestead reform pilot.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.141.175