标准必要专利案件中FRAND费率的确定  

Determination of FRAND Rates in Standard Essential Patent Cases

作　　者：芮松艳 Rui Songyan

机构地区：[1]北京知识产权法院审判委员会

出　　处：《政法论坛》2024年第6期108-117,共10页Tribune of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：FRAND原则中的“公平、合理”与“无歧视”从不同角度对于专利权人和实施者进行了限制,其中“公平、合理”强调个体与整体的关系,而“无歧视”则强调个体与个体的关系。虽然FRAND费率在标准必要专利所涉三类案件中均是审理重点之一,但不同类型的案件对于FRAND费率的证明程度要求有所不同。FRAND费率的确定通常采用两种方法:自上而下(Top-Down)法与可比费率法,二者可以相互验证。上述方法中所使用的参数,不仅与产品相关,亦需要与专利相关。在使用的参数及计算逻辑均具有合理性的情况下,据此推算的费率至少在个案中可被认定符合FRAND要求。"Fair,reasonable"and"non-discriminatory"in FRAND principle restrict patentees and per-petrators from different angles,wherein"Fair,reasonable"emphasizes the relationship between individuals and the whole,while"non-discriminatory"emphasizes the relationship between individuals and individuals.Although the FRAND rate is one of the trial focuses in all three types of cases involved in standard essential patents,diferent types of cases have different requirements for the degree of proof of FRAND rate.FRAND rates are usually determined using two methods:the Top-Down method and the comparable rate method,which can be mutually verified.The parameters used in the above method are not only relevant to the product,but also to the patent.If the parameters used and the logic of the calculation are reasonable,the resulting rate can be found to meet the FRAND requirements at least in the case.

关 键 词：标准必要专利 费率 自上而下(Top-Down) 可比费率 

分 类 号：D997.1[政治法律—国际法学]