乳晕单瓣法、丝线牵引法和乳晕双瓣法矫正Ⅲ型乳头内陷的疗效比较  

Comparison on the curative effect of areola single⁃flap method,silk traction method,areola double⁃flap method in typeⅢnipple retraction

作　　者：陶国贵 刘小敏 孙小青 左田田 吴婉虹 胡志奇[2] TAO Guogui;LIU Xiaomin;SUN Xiaoqing;ZUO Tiantian;WU Wan-hong;HU Zhiqi(Department of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology,Clifford Hospital,Guangzhou 510000,Guang-dong,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]广东省祈福医院整形美容科,广东广州510000 [2]南方医科大学南方医院整形外科,广东广州510515

出　　处：《实用医学杂志》2024年第22期3160-3164,共5页The Journal of Practical Medicine

基　　金：国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:82172235)。

摘　　要：目的对比分析乳晕单瓣法、丝线牵引法和乳晕双瓣法矫正Ⅲ型乳头内陷方法的临床影响。方法回顾性选取2018年5月至2023年12月于祈福医院收治的93例Ⅲ型乳头内陷患者,根据手术方法的不同分为A组(丝线牵引法,n=30)、B组(乳晕双瓣法,n=31)、C组(乳晕单瓣法,n=32),对比3组患者手术时间、疗效、血运障碍、乳头外观及功能改善程度、并发症、满意度及复发情况。结果3组手术时间比较,B组>A组>C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。C组总有效率高于A组和B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但A组与B组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组血运障碍发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。C组乳头外观及功能改善程度评分均高于A组、B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但A组与B组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。C组并发症发生率低于A组和B组,满意度高于A组和B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但A组与B组并发症和满意度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B组、C组复发率均低于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与丝线牵引法和乳晕双瓣法比较,采用乳晕单瓣法矫正Ⅲ型乳头内陷的效果更优,更利于提高临床疗效和满意度,改善乳头外观及功能,减少并发症发生率和复发率。Objective To compare and analyze clinical effects of three correction methods in typeⅢnipple retraction.Methods A total of 93 patients with typeⅢnipple retraction were retrospectively enrolled at Clifford Hospital between May 2018 and December 2023.Based on the different surgical methods employed,they were categorized into three groups:group A(silk traction method,n=30),group B(areola double-flap method,n=31),and group C(areola single-flap method,n=32).The study compared the operation time,therapeutic efficacy,hemodynamic disorders,improvement in nipple appearance and function,complications,patient satisfac-tion,and recurrence rates among these three groups.Results The operation duration was significantly longer in group B compared to groups A and C(P<0.05).Group C exhibited a significantly higher total response rate than groups A and B(P<0.05),while no significant difference was observed between groups A and B(P>0.05).There were no significant differences in the incidence of hemodynamic disorders among the three groups(P>0.05).The improvement scores for nipple appearance and function were significantly higher in group C compared to groups A and B(P<0.05),with no significant difference between groups A and B(P>0.05).The incidence of complications was lower,satisfaction was higher,both being statistically significant,in group C compared to groups A and B(P<0.05),but there were no significant differences in the incidence of complications or satisfaction between groups A and B(P>0.05).The recurrence rate was significantly lower in group B and group C than in group A(P<0.05).Conclusion The correction effect of the areola single-flap method is superior to that of the silk trac-tion method and areola double-flap method in patients with typeⅢnipple retraction,thereby enhancing clinical efficacy,patient satisfaction,nipple aesthetics,and functionality while reducing complications and recurrence rates.

关 键 词：乳头内陷 并发症 乳晕单瓣法 丝线牵引法 乳晕双瓣法 

分 类 号：R655.8[医药卫生—外科学]