检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨新铭 YANG Xinming(Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing,China)
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院大学经济学院 [2]中国社会科学院信息情报研究院国家安全学研究中心,100005
出 处:《经济学动态》2024年第9期3-19,共17页Economic Perspectives
基 金:中国社会科学院智库基础研究项目“分阶段实现共同富裕的理论和路径研究”。
摘 要:共同富裕是中国特色社会主义的本质要求,是中国式现代化的重要特征,具有促进经济增长与改善收入分配的两重经济学内涵。分阶段推动共同富裕是习近平经济思想的重要内容,体现了习近平经济思想的人民性特征。本文在已有研究基础上给出了技术进步、经济增长与收入分配关系演进的统一解释,即在多重技术进步叠加的条件下,完整的库兹涅茨“倒U”型过程将被多个“倒U”型过程上升阶段的前后衔接所取代,表现为收入差距随着经济增长而持续扩大,而不是简单的波浪式变化。鉴于中国正处于新型工业化持续推进的新阶段,必须在调整收入分配的收入效应与结构效应中取得平衡,而这正是分阶段推动共同富裕的理论基础。相比于赶超经济体,中国有更多的优势条件实现更长时间、更高速度的经济增长,而益贫性政策已经促成中国收入差距进入下降通道,因此,要为不同地区、不同人群匹配差异化初次分配和再分配政策,以实现经济增长与收入分配改善的双重目标。Achieving common prosperity is a defining feature of socialism with Chinese characteristics and an essential requirement of Chinese modernization.It is not only a goal of Chinese modernization but also a standard for measuring Chinese modernization,which is endogenous to China’s social system.Achieving common prosperity means narrowing income inequality while maintaining economic growth.The theory of technological progress,globalization,etc.,which are used to explain the widening of income inequality in developed countries in the 1980s,do not apply to China,because China’s development is a typical example of industrialization,urbanization,informatization,and digital(intelligent)parallel development.It is manifested in the superposition of multiple technological progress,and the complete Kuznets“inverted U”process will be replaced by the successive succession of the rising stages of multiple“inverted U”processes,which is manifested in the continuous widening of income inequality with economic growth.However,this is not the truth of China’s income inequality since the 1950s.China’s income inequality is consistent with the“flat S”evolution process,while the income inequality in other economies showed a U-shaped change during the same period.Therefore,the logic of the evolution of China’s income inequality is the balance between efficiency and fairness of policies,which is based on the degree of economic development.The practices have proved that the policy of balancing efficiency and fairness has been effective since the 1950s.When economic development is extremely low,the government focuses on rapidly concentrating limited resources to build a complete economic system by grade wages.Then,it is necessary to improve the efficiency of the labor force by improving the incentive mechanism to achieve efficiency improvement and promote economic growth,which will inevitably be accompanied by widening income disparity.When the excessive income gap of residents suppresses the potential consumption deman
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30