检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:殷曈曈 陈嘉怡 黄露 王丽[1] 李铁 YIN Tongtong;CHEN Jiayi;HUANG Lu;WANG Li;LI Tie(School of Nursing,Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University,Suzhou,Jiangsu 215006,China;School of Physical Education,Huizhou University,Huizhou,Guangdong516007,China)
机构地区:[1]苏州大学医学院护理学院,江苏苏州215006 [2]惠州学院体育学院,广东惠州516007
出 处:《职业与健康》2024年第16期2294-2298,共5页Occupation and Health
摘 要:老龄化带来的健康问题日益凸显,准确评估老年人身体功能是制定针对性干预措施的前提和基础。国内外关于身体功能的评估工具较多,然而在工具使用方面存在一些不恰当情况。本文对国内外开发的社区老年人身体功能评估工具进行综述,着重探讨不同评估工具在适用人群、评价内容和评判方法上的差异,分析其优缺点、信效度、国内外应用情况等,旨在为更加合理应用身体功能评估工具对社区老年人进行评估提供参考,为我国开发或引入适合的工具提供借鉴。The health problems caused by aging are becoming increasingly prominent,and accurately assessing the physical function of the elderly is the prerequisite and foundation for developing targeted intervention measures.There are many assessment tools for physical function both domestically and internationally,but there are some inappropriate situations in the use of these tools.This article provides a review of community elderly physical function assessment tools developed both domestically and internationally,with a focus on exploring the differences in applicable populations,evaluation content,and evaluation methods among different assessment tools.The article analyzes their advantages,disadvantages,reliability,validity,and application status both domestically and internationally.The aim is to provide reference for the more rational use of physical function assessment tools for evaluating community elderly,and to offer guidance for the development or introduction of suitable tools in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13