检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:史新立 裴娜 SHI Xinli;PEI Na(School of Civil Engineering,Tangshan University,Tangshan 063000,China)
出 处:《唐山学院学报》2024年第6期43-47,79,共6页Journal of Tangshan University
基 金:唐山市建筑节能与绿色建筑检测重点实验室项目(140160001)。
摘 要:选取了4种北方农村地区常用的供暖形式(燃煤供暖、燃气壁挂炉供暖、电热水锅炉供暖、电热膜+蓄热式电供暖)作为研究对象,通过对典型农户整个供暖季室内外温度及能源消耗量进行测试,分别对其产生的室内热环境、经济性及污染物排放量进行对比分析。研究发现:燃气供暖在室内热环境及环保性方面优于其他供暖形式;电供暖在经济性方面最优,而电热水锅炉供暖和电热膜+蓄热式电供暖相比,二者虽然耗电量明显不同,但运行费用并没有明显差异。Four commonly-used heating forms in northern China rural(coal heating,gas heater on the wall,electric hot water boiler heating,and electric film+thermal storage electric heating)are selected as the research objects.By testing the indoor and outdoor temperatures and energy consumption of typical households throughout the heating season,the indoor thermal environment,economic efficiency,and pollutant emissions are compared and analyzed.It is found that gas heating is superior to other heating forms in terms of indoor thermal environment and environmental protection;electric heating is the most economical,while electric hot water boiler heating and electric film+thermal storage electric heating,although they have significantly different electricity consumption,does not show a significant difference in operating costs.
分 类 号:TU833.1[建筑科学—供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.209.172