法秩序统一性视野下违法性冲突的消除  

Elimination of Illegality Conflict from the Perspective of Legal Order Unity

作　　者：蒋太珂 Jiang Taike(School of Criminal Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2024年第11期64-76,158,共14页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“因果力比较的归责构造及其运用研究”(21CFX037);内蒙古人民检察院调研项目“法定犯时代行刑衔接的难点及其完善机制”(NJ2023575);华东政法大学苏惠渔刑法学研究基金资助项目“共同犯罪的归责原理与结果归责”的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：消除因行为规范冲突导致的违法性冲突,是维护法秩序统一性的当然要求。容忍违法性冲突不但缺乏积极的实践意义,而且相关论证存在理论误读。在消除刑法规范与前置法规范的违法性冲突问题上,前置法规范并非当然优先于刑法规范。应当立足于利益衡量的立场,探求消除前置法规范与刑法规范间的冲突之具体方式。根据利益衡量结论的不同,前置法优先于刑法、刑法优先于前置法,或者刑法和前置法各自限定适用范围,都是消除刑法与前置法冲突的方式。Eliminating conflict of illegality resulting from the clash of behavioral norms is a fundamental requirement for maintaining the unity of legal order.Tolerating such conflict of illegality not only lacks positive practical significance but also involves theoretical misunderstandings.In addressing the conflict of illegality between criminal law norms and pre-established laws,pre-established laws do not inherently take precedence over criminal laws.Instead,a balanced approach based on interest evaluation should be adopted to explore specific ways to resolve conflict between pre-established law and criminal law.Depending on the results of the interest evaluation,solutions to the conflict between criminal law and pre-established law may include prioritizing pre-established law over criminal law,prioritizing criminal law over pre-established law,or delineating the scope of application for each.

关 键 词：违法性冲突 法秩序统一性 前置法优先 利益衡量 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学] D921[政治法律—法学]