经济犯罪案件中不法中介打击及其中介费追缴难点与解决路径探析  

Analyze Difficulties Of Combating Illegal Intermediaries And Recovering Intermediary Fees In Economic Crime Cases and Solutions

作　　者：张宇兰 汤海挺 胡江江 Zhang Yulan;Tang Haiting;Hu Jiangjiang(Economic Crime Investigation Department of Shanghai,Shanghai 200083,China)

机构地区：[1]上海市公安局经济犯罪侦查总队,上海200083

出　　处：《上海公安学院学报》2024年第5期42-48,共7页Journal of Shanghai Police College

摘　　要：近年来,不法中介行为不断催化和升级经济犯罪,社会危害极大。受制于不法中介行为的事实查证难、定性难,中介费追缴权限、标准不明和侦查员取证能力欠缺等因素,公安机关无法有效打击处理较低层级的不法中介人员,中介费追缴率不高。公检法机关之间应建立协同打击机制,按照诈骗类犯罪的共犯、单独认定手段行为犯罪分层次定罪打击,综合运用犯罪所得追缴、“恶意取得”查证、民事诉讼并进等追赃挽损措施,同步完善行刑衔接、信息共享制度,进而形成打防合力,提升打击效果和中介费追缴效率。In recent years,illegal intermediary activities have continuously catalyzed and escalated economic crimes,which do great harm to our society.Owing to the difficulties in collecting evidence and determining the nature of illegal intermediary behaviors,the unclear authority and standards for retrieving intermediary fees,and investigators'lack of evidence-collecting competence and etc.,police agencies are unable to effectively combat and handle lower level illegal intermediary personnel,thus resulting in a low rate of intermediary fee recovery.Police,procuratorial and judicial agencies should establish a joint mechanism to combat fraud based on different degree of involvement or individual identification methods,and take various measures to impound criminal proceeds,to collect evidence of“evil gains”,and to launch civil litigation to retrieve defrauded property and make up losses,synchronously to improve the mechanism of linkage between criminal and civil punishment and to share information,thus forming a joint force of prevention and control and improving the combat effectiveness and the efficiency of recovering intermediary fees.

关 键 词：经济犯罪 中介行为 刑事打击 

分 类 号：D631[政治法律—政治学]