历史学为什么要成为一门科学——对话易建平《历史学的事实判断与价值判断》  

Why Historiography Should Become a Science−A Discussion with Yi Jianping on“Factual and Value Judgments in Historiography”

作　　者：成一农 CHENG Yinong

机构地区：[1]云南大学历史与档案学院,昆明650091

出　　处：《经济社会史评论》2024年第4期4-14,124,共12页Economic and Social History Review

摘　　要：在《历史学的事实判断与价值判断》一文中,易建平教授论证了历史学作为一门科学,应当在研究中尽量排除“价值判断”的影响。但该文在研究对象和方法层面未能充分论证历史学何以成为一门科学,且未能对如何识别、切分“价值判断”和“事实判断”的方法以及可能性进行充分讨论;更为重要的是,易教授没有对历史学为什么要成为一门科学加以探讨。虽然如此,该文对历史学本源问题的诸多分析,或许能让缺乏可行性研究方法、缺乏研究深度的中国历史学界认真思考理论方法层面的问题。毕竟“求真”才是历史研究塑造现在和影响未来的力量所在,将历史学建设为科学的每一份努力都难能可贵。In the article“Factual and Value Judgments in historiography”,Professor Yi Jianping argued that historiography,as a science,should try to exclude the influence of“value judgments”in historiographical research.However,his article failed to fully demonstrate how historiography had become a science in terms of research objects and methods,and also failed to fully discuss on the methods and possibilities for identifying and dividing“value judgments”and“factual judgments”;more importantly,Professor Yi did not explore why historiography should become a“science”.Nevertheless,the various analysis of the origin of historiography in this article may enable the Chinese historiographical community,which lacks feasible research methods and in-depth research,to seriously consider theoretical and methodological issues.After all,“seeking the truth”is the power that shapes the present and influences the future of historiographical research,and every effort to build historiography into a science is precious.

关 键 词：历史学 科学 事实判断 价值判断 历史学家 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]