论基于专用品销售之专利默示许可的判定标准  

Judgment Criteria for Patent Implied License Based on Specialized Product Sales

作　　者：杨德桥 YANG Deqiao(School of Humanities and Law,Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology,Baotou 014010)

机构地区：[1]内蒙古科技大学文法学院,包头014010

出　　处：《中国发明与专利》2024年第11期63-73,共11页China Invention & Patent

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金西部和边疆地区项目“合同法与专利法协调视角下的专利默示许可制度构建研究”(编号18XJC820004)。

摘　　要：基于专用品销售的默示许可,是专利默示许可中的常见情形,可以划分为直接侵权案件中的默示许可和间接侵权案件中的默示许可。专用品不存在非侵权用途以及交易环境明显支持默示许可的存在,是直接侵权案件中默示许可的成立条件。与默示许可有关的间接侵权表现为帮助侵权。专利的直接实施者是否获得了权利人的默示许可,是判定间接侵权成立与否的关键。对于专用品非侵权用途的判定,我国法院在司法实践中形成了“实质性作用+不具有实质性非侵权用途”的判定标准。在专用品构成要件证明责任的分配上,首先应由被控侵权人证明专用品在专利技术方案中具有“实质性作用”,进而由专利权人证明专用品存在“非侵权用途”。基于专用品销售之专利默示许可的规则形式,宜采用“司法解释+入库案例”的方式加以呈现。The implied license based on the sale of specialized products is the common situation in patent implied license,which can be divided into implied license in direct infringement cases and implied license in indirect infringement cases.The absence of non-infringing use of specialized products and the obvious support of implied licensing in the trading environment are the conditions for the establishment of implied licensing in direct infringement cases.The indirect infringement related to implied licensing is manifested as contributory infringement.Whether the direct implementer of a patent has obtained the implied permission of the right holder is the key to determining whether indirect infringement is established or not.For the determination of non-infringing use of specialized products,Chinese courts have formed a judgment standard of“substantive effect+without substantive non-infringing use”in judicial practice.In the allocation of the burden of proof for the constituent elements of specialized products,the accused infringer should first prove that the specialized products have a“substantive role”in the patented technical solution,and then the patentee should prove that the specialized products have a“non-infringing use”.The rule form of patent implied license based on the sale of specialized products should be presented in the form of“judicial interpretation+warehousing case”.

关 键 词：专利 专用品销售 侵权 默示许可 非侵权用途 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]