检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈余柱 CHEN Yu-zhu(Jiangsu Provincial Transportation Engineering Group Bairun Engineering Testing Co.,Ltd.,Zhenjiang 212100,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏省交通工程集团百润工程检测有限公司,镇江212100
出 处:《价值工程》2024年第33期107-109,共3页Value Engineering
摘 要:对于在役桥梁在使用一段时间后,需要了解桥梁的健康状况,由于荷载试验是一种比较简单的方法,往往通过荷载试验对其承载进行评定。在荷载试验中,一项评定承载能力的重要指标就是校验系数,但是对桥梁进行理论计算分析时往往会对桥梁实际结构形式进行简化,从而导致校验系数与实际情况不符,不能准确评定桥梁的承载能力。本文通过研究桥面铺装、防撞护栏和弹性模型三种因素,分析其对简支T梁桥校验系数的影响。For in-service bridges,it is necessary to understand their health condition after a period of use.As load testing is a relatively simple method,its load-bearing capacity is often evaluated through load testing.In load testing,an important indicator for evaluating the bearing capacity is the verification coefficient.However,when conducting theoretical calculations and analysis of bridges,the actual structural form of the bridge is often simplified,resulting in a discrepancy between the verification coefficient and the actual situation,which cannot accurately evaluate the bearing capacity of the bridge.This article analyzes the impact of three factors,namely bridge deck pavement,crash barriers,and elastic models,on the verification coefficients of simply supported T-beam bridges.
分 类 号:U446.1[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.104.216